请选择 进入手机版 | 继续访问电脑版

tag 标签: CURRENT经管大学堂:名校名师名课

相关帖子

版块 作者 回复/查看 最后发表
关于Binscatter 外文文献专区 kedemingshi 2022-3-8 1 1059 www~. 2022-12-1 21:02:17
零程过程动力学的有限尺寸效应 外文文献专区 mingdashike22 2022-3-7 0 213 mingdashike22 2022-3-7 20:44:00
悬赏 Eviews6处理非平衡面板时如何输入截面和时序数据 - [悬赏 10 个论坛币] EViews专版 paopaotangmm 2013-4-2 6 4165 梦与梦仙 2016-5-11 10:13:45
Advanced Motion Control and Sensing for Intelligent Vehicles attach_img 运营管理(物流与供应链管理) Toyotomi 2013-1-25 3 2460 zhujianwenyu 2015-8-27 09:00:27
2013 current issue翻译 & Basel讲义 attachment CFA、CVA、FRM等金融考证论坛 yourpsj 2013-4-23 98 9512 kage_do 2014-4-3 11:02:42
悬赏 Framing and conflict: aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current - [!reward_solved!] attachment 求助成功区 aku2008 2013-7-23 2 1618 aku2008 2013-7-23 21:47:21
悬赏 On-line monitoring of HV bushings and current transformers - [!reward_solved!] attachment 求助成功区 minibarglass 2013-7-10 1 1620 liuningzheng 2013-7-10 21:21:10
2012年CFA二级考题供参考 CFA学习群组 金融专属 2013-5-28 1 4075 angellover1128 2013-5-28 17:10:08
[Z]Differences between scan and Call scan SAS专版 zhou.wen 2013-5-24 2 1697 boe 2013-5-24 13:10:50
悬赏 Positive emotion in sport performance: current status and future directions - [!reward_solved!] attachment 求助成功区 诗成 2013-4-8 1 1598 suhongyu000 2013-4-8 19:05:02
Matlab alphamap 设置alphamap 的属性 MATLAB等数学软件专版 xuning5176 2013-4-5 0 3398 xuning5176 2013-4-5 15:21:39
因子分析求助 attachment 爱问频道 chengchao 2013-1-22 5 3601 ecomanager 2013-2-28 17:43:58
转~Sony Announces the PlayStation 4 休闲灌水 本人傻傻 2013-2-23 0 1580 本人傻傻 2013-2-23 00:59:31
美国2011年各大都市区GDP数据(2001-2010)(csv格式) attachment 数据分析与数据挖掘 ZhongDingJian 2013-1-24 0 2226 ZhongDingJian 2013-1-24 11:38:12
Lessons from the Fiscal Cliff 真实世界经济学(含财经时事) gongtianyu 2013-1-22 1 2069 gongtianyu 2013-1-22 01:01:21
History and current System of Real Estate Tax(word版) attachment 真实世界经济学(含财经时事) wonburosa 2006-8-29 4 2898 赫赫禾苗 2012-10-8 12:22:54
US GAAP GUIDE-Restatement and Analysis of Current FASB Standards attachment 金融学(理论版) sxtyliuy 2006-8-11 0 2714 sxtyliuy 2011-10-24 10:38:58
A comparative analysis of current credit risk models attachment 金融学(理论版) hk1603 2005-7-5 3 3025 边城浪子 2011-10-7 07:45:58
[下载]FRM 2009 Readings for Current Issues in Financial Markets attachment CFA、CVA、FRM等金融考证论坛 qcd0024 2009-4-4 2 2832 tung1205 2009-5-12 23:01:00
CURRENT APPROACHES TO CREDIT RISK MEASUREMEN attachment 金融学(理论版) bluehy 2008-9-13 0 2286 bluehy 2008-9-13 14:15:00

相关日志

分享 【2015新书】Internet governance: origins, current issues, and future possibiliti ...
kychan 2015-4-20 12:31
【2015新书】Internet governance: origins, current issues, and future possibilities https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-3672777-1-1.html 声明: 本资源仅供学术研究参考之用,发布者不负任何法律责任,敬请下载者支持购买正版。 提倡免费分享! 我发全部免费的,分文不收 来看看 ... 你也可关注我 https://bbs.pinggu.org/z_guanzhu.php?action=addfuid=3727866 请加入 【KYCHAN文库】 https://bbs.pinggu.org/forum.php?mod=collectionaction=viewctid=2819 【KYCHAN文库】 是kychan贡献上传的大量书籍, 用户免费下载 速度执行:立刻,现在,马上欢迎订阅 想要实时获取免费的书籍,请在我的头像下方点 "加关注" 哟!
个人分类: 【每日精华】|27 次阅读|1 个评论
分享 关于option
hellozcy 2014-2-9 08:00
In-the-money: A call option is in-the-money when its strike price is below the current trading price of the underlying asset. A put option is in-the-money when its strike price is above the current trading price of the underlying asset. In-the-money options are generally more expensive as their premiums consist of significant intrinsic value on the top of their time value. Out of money option: An option without any intrinsic value is an out-of-the-money (OTM) option. A call option is out-of-the-money when the strike price is above the current trading price of the underlying security. Intrinsic value: option value if it expired immediately. Intrinsic call value=max(S-X,0). Intrinsic value 0, then the option is in the money. Speculative Value: Speculative Value=Option Price - Intrinsic Value
21 次阅读|0 个评论
分享 Apple And Taxes
insight 2013-4-25 15:54
Apple And Taxes Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/23/2013 17:50 -0400 Apple Dividend Recap Federal Tax Confused why AAPL is opting for the dividend recap route (as we predicted it would in January )? Simple: as the first chart below reminds us, as of December 31, nearly 70% of the company's total cash, which has grown to a record $145 billion in the current quarter, was held offshore. This means that if AAPL wanted to repatriate this $100 billion or so in cash, it would have to pay Federal tax on it, amounting to dozens of billions in remittances to Uncle Sam as this is cash which AAPL does not have full access to for US based operations. Hence: it has opted to raise cash by issuing debt instead of repatriating its cash. Which brings up an interesting point. As we have shown in the past, perhaps the one thing Tim Cook's company has loathed more than anything in the past, is to pay taxes, which is why it has some of the most convoluted legal tax shelters imaginable. Indeed, in the current quarter, according to the company's cash flow statement, a tiny $2.4 billion was paid in cash taxes. Putting this number in perspective, the company had an operating profit of $12.4 billion. Or, cumulatively, since December 2008, AAPL has generated a grand total of $149 billion in operating profit, while paying just $21 billion in total taxes. Is it apparent now why some $100 billion in Apple cash is not fully recourse to the company? Unless, of course, AAPL decides to follow Gerard Depardieu's example, and run away into the tax-amnesty friendly steppes of Russia, where it will be free to do as it wishes with all of its cash... Average: 4.88889 Your rating: None Average: 4.9 ( 9 votes)
个人分类: inequality|13 次阅读|0 个评论
分享 Format temporary? permanent?
yukai08008 2013-3-16 22:00
If you do not specify the LIBRARY= option, formats are stored in a default format catalog named Work.Formats. As the libref Work implies, any format that is stored in Work.Formats is a temporary format that exists only for the current SAS session.
个人分类: 学习笔记|0 个评论
分享 Charting US Debt And Deficit Since Inception
insight 2012-12-18 15:24
Charting US Debt And Deficit Since Inception Submitted by Tyler Durden on 12/17/2012 23:00 -0500 Alan Greenspan Budget Deficit Central Banks Congressional Budget Office Federal Reserve Gross Domestic Product Japan Layering Lehman Lehman Brothers Monetization Mutual Assured Destruction Shadow Banking Sovereign Debt In the recent aftermath of the US just concluding its fourth consecutive fiscal year with a $1 trillion+ deficit, we have been flooded with requests to show how the current fiscal situation stacks up in a big picture context. Very big picture context . For all those requests, we present the following chart showing total US Federal debt/GDP as well as Deficit/(Surplus)/GDP since inception, or in this case as close as feasible, or 1792, which appears to be the first recorded year of historical fiscal data. We can see why readers have been so eager to see the " real big picture " - the chart is nothing short of stunning. Some observations: Beginning with the Anglo-American war of 1812, and continuing through the US civil war, World War I and World War II, the major military shocks to the US fiscal system are clearly obvious. Just as obvious is the impact of not only The Great Moderation which started in the early 1980s just before the 1987 arrival of Alan Greenspan at the helm of the Fed, which allowed the US to exchange fiscal prudence for ever cheaper debt which could and would be used to fund an ever greater budget deficit, and lead to a surge in the Federal debt. The increasingly more unstable system, which saw the additional layering of another $23 trillion in shadow banking debt at its peak in 2008, as well as countless trillions in household, corporate and financial debt, as well as hundreds of trillions in underfunded welfare liabilities, led first to the Internet bubble, then the Housing and Credit bubble, and finally, to the Great Financial Crisis of 2008 which climaxed with the failure of Lehman brothers, and resulted in the central bank bailout of every developed bank, and shortly thereafter, the backstop of every peripheral country in Europe. The gravity and impact of the Great Financial Crisis on the US economy is stark, very visible, and can only be compared to previous instances of destructive military conflict in terms of lost output and impact on the US economy. Total US Debt/GDP is currently just over 103%. This number is expected to rise to 125% by the end of 2016, which will eclipse the peak debt/GDP seen in World War II, and be the highest in US history. Whereas in the past episodes of fiscal catastrophe were accompanied not only by a surge in debt (black line), but by a parallel explosion in fiscal deficits (red bars), this time the deficit spike has been more modest (peaking at about 10% of GDP), but more protracted, with even the CBO expecting deficits of around $1 trillion to last for the next several years. One possible interpretation is that due to the Fed's relentless interest rates intervention, the polarized US government feels no burning desire to promptly balance its budget, and even overshoot, and through a combination of aggressive spending cuts and/or revenue increases, result in a much needed surplus which would be used to reduce the sovereign debt. This is graphically seen in the ongoing Fiscal Cliff debate, when any proposal for substantial spending cuts - the true problem at the core of America's deficit habituation and welfare statism - is greeted with shrieks of Mutual Assured Destruction. This is not a political issue: politicians on both sides of the aisle are perfectly aware that setting the US on a sustainable fiscal course would mean massive pain for the common citizen, and an immediate termination of all existing political careers: after all the myth of the welfare state is at stake. It is in everyone's interest - both GOP and Democrat - to perpetuate the unsustainable deficit status quo indefinitely. Any theatrics out of the GOP demanding fiscal conservatism are therefore just that - theatrics. There is no question that it is unsustainable: US GDP is currently growing at a pace of 1.5%-2.5% at best. Total 2012 US debt will have risen at a rate of 8%, and will continue rising in the 6%-8% range. More disturbing is the influence of the Fed, whose policy of ZIRP and outright debt monetization (recall even JPM has now admitted the Fed will monetize all US debt issuance in 2013) is the only permissive factor that has allowed the US to delay the inevitable moment of reckoning as long it has. Indicatively, a modest rise in the average US interest rate, which is currently at all time blended lows, to just 5%, would mean that in 3 years the US would spend, pro forma, $1 trillion in cash interest each year . At that point the US will approach Japan status, where the government needs to borrow just to fund interest outlays. Actually, instead of Japan, Weimar would be a better analogy. Finally, on all previous historical occasions, there was at least one backstop of last reserve, a central bank, standing ready to step in and provide the necessary liquidity, and monetize the needed debt to keep the show running. Since 2009, all the central banks have also gone all in on the Keynesian endgame: at this point the next shock to the status quo system will be the last, as there is no more backstops. At that point the only two options will be outright monetary devaluation, though not relative in the closed monetary loop of modern monetarism, but absolute , where every currency is concurrently devalued against a hard asset (potentially with the forceful concurrent confiscation of said hard asset by the host government, think Executive Order 6102), in order to generate a terminal currency and debt debasement, or outright global debt moratoria, and the end of the modern financial system as we know it (but not before the financial "leaders" of our time have converted enough of their paper wealth into hard asset format and transferred it to more peaceful, more "gun-controlled", non-extradition territories). And there you have it. Oh, and whoever said the advent of the Federal Reserve, or the end of "hard money" standard courtesy of Richard Nixon, made catastrophic or systematically shocking events less frequent, probably should have their head examined. Average: 5 Your rating: None Average: 5 ( 13 votes) Tweet Login or register to post comments 5750 reads Printer-friendly version Send to friend Similar Articles You Might Enjoy: IMF Says Japan And Spain Are Done, "Debt Ratio Will Never Stabilize" A Mushroom Cloudy Future: In 2016 Japan, Net Debt Per Capita Will Be $140,000 As US Closes June With $15,856,367,214,324.44 In Federal Debt, US Debt/GDP Hits Post WWII High Of 101.5% UBS Issues Hyperinflation Warning For US And UK, Calls It Purely "A Fiscal Phenomenon" Deja 2011 Vu Part 2: Goldman Sees Another US Downgrade In 2013
9 次阅读|0 个评论
分享 "Getting To The Bottom Of It All"
insight 2012-12-17 15:04
"Getting To The Bottom Of It All" Submitted by Tyler Durden on 12/16/2012 11:42 -0500 Reality From Bill Buckler, author of The Privateer "Getting To The Bottom Of It All" To put the magnitude of the current global fiscal and financial profligacy in perspective, The Privateer has in the past made use of a simple illustration. As the “fiscal cliff” looms and as the Treasury’s debt “subject to limit” grows to about $US 60 Billion below that “limit”, we make the point again. How is it possible for a nation of almost 100 million people to survive - and indeed prosper exceedingly - when the government of that nation has a TOTAL debt of about $US 2 Billion? That question is asked in the context of today. Today, that same nation has a population of a bit more than 300 million people and is “run” by a government whose funded debts approach $US 16,400 Billion and whose TOTAL debts (funded and unfunded) are in excess of $US 200,000 Billion? That is the record of the US over the past century. Its population has tripled. Its government debt has grown by a factor of 100,000. Which - IN REALITY - is the prosperous nation? Is it the US of 1912 or the US of 2012? Which - IN REALITY - is the nation whose citizens can look confidently towards a future in which their progeny will enjoy the fruits of their parents’ labour WITHOUT being indentured to their parents’ profligacy? Which is the nation that has not yet embarked on currency debasement and which is the nation that is nearing the inevitable end of that same road? Everybody knows the answers to these questions too. Average: 4.75 Your rating: None Average: 4.8 ( 16 votes) Tweet Login or register to post comments 8609 reads Printer-friendly version Send to friend Similar Articles You Might Enjoy: Santelli Sums It Up In 10 Words: "Debt Ceiling Is Not The Problem. Debt Is The Problem" Obama’s (dumb) Line in the Sand Eric Sprott On America's Great Endangered Species: "The 99%" Is A Gold Standard Possible? Is The Fed Responsible For The Great Financial Crisis?
12 次阅读|0 个评论

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-3-28 17:42