请选择 进入手机版 | 继续访问电脑版
楼主: 汀左
1092 2

[休闲其它] 【独家发布】“穹顶之下”:北京车辆限行对污染及经济活动的影响 [推广有奖]

  • 3关注
  • 10粉丝

博士生

45%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

Economic Oil on Canvas

威望
0
论坛币
1919 个
通用积分
5.7797
学术水平
13 点
热心指数
11 点
信用等级
11 点
经验
7137 点
帖子
185
精华
0
在线时间
252 小时
注册时间
2011-7-8
最后登录
2024-4-16

汀左 发表于 2015-3-2 15:26:23 |显示全部楼层 |坛友微信交流群
相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
The Effect of Beijing’s Driving Restrictions on Pollution and Economic Activity

文 |
YE Qianlin

本文继续应景“穹顶之下”所引发的环境讨论。这个关于北京车辆限行对空气污染和经济活动的研究从09年就开始了,但多年后才发出来,多么不容易呀。个人认为,这篇文章从微观层面验证了短期内减轻污染和增加经济活动(labor supply)之间的确存在trade-off,但cost-benefit ananlysis显示收益大于成本,主要是因为reduced pollution提高了人们的健康水平。但治理污染会损害经济增长吗?我认为理论上这需要建立一个structual model,实证上需要长期的跨国宏观数据。柴静在“穹顶之下”中提到,英国大烟雾事件后,治理污染的同时并没有出现经济下行,GDP反而番了四倍,就业人数也增长了。但经济学家如果可以用structual model给出counterfactual results(不治理环境会怎么样),对我而言会更有说服力。

This paper identified the causal effects of Beijing’s Odd-Even and One-Day-Per-Week driving restrictions on reduced pollution (particular matters) and reduced economic activities (labor supply). To see the effect on aggregate pollution, they used an RD design to exploit both time-series and spatial variation. Their point estimates indicated that the every-other-day restrictions reduced particulate matter by 18% and one-day-a-week restrictions by 21%.

To measure the effect on labor supply, they divided workers into two categories: self-employed and hourly workers. The proxy for working time is TV viewership, which biases the effect because the reduced auto congestion and pollution may make outdoor activities more attractive relative to indoor TV viewership. Therefore, they considered viewership during restricted hours and outside hours separately. For self-employed workers, viewership increases by 8.9 to 16.9% during the restricted hours of the one-day-a-week policy while viewership changes little outside the restricted hours ruling out the possibility that longer daily working hours offset fewer working days. Since hourly worker cannot adjust their schedule flexibly, their viewership during the restricted hours should be unaffected. But there is a decrease in their viewership due to fewer at-home sick days resulting from reduced pollution. Changes outside restricted hours are minor, too.

The high compliance of workers suggests the driving restrictions’ success. But lessons from other countries show that the effects may be compensated by buying more cars to throw off the shackles. At the end of the paper, it's emphasized that the effects are short-run. On the long run, as income in China increases, the compensating response is likely.

-------------
The Effect of Beijing’s Driving Restrictions on Pollution and Economic Activity.pdf (560.2 KB, 需要: 1 个论坛币)



二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:车辆限行 穹顶之下 经济活动 Restrictions Compensating Driving_Restriction

本帖被以下文库推荐

支持楼主,多谢分享。

使用道具

汀左 发表于 2015-3-2 16:41:31 |显示全部楼层 |坛友微信交流群
luoyangzhijian 发表于 2015-3-2 15:33
支持楼主,多谢分享。

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-4-18 13:39