自己的论文从盲审专家的意见以及答辩老师的意见可以看出他们都不懂,所以问的问题很奇怪,然而给的分数又不高。在我看来他们只是不懂,又不敢鉴定创新。我的博士论文已经有哥伦比亚大学教授的推荐信,以及我这个领域顶级专家写的推荐信。他们都很认可我的贡献以及在本领域的基础性研究。
请问我是否应该拿着推荐信向学校反映一下重新鉴定?然而我又知道的确他们不熟悉我这个领域而无法给出真正的建议。但是,由于我已经花费六年时间做我的研究,只为这一篇论文,结果因为他们不懂而分数不高,我可能错失优秀博士论文。我心里很不平衡。相比来说,一些在职的同学,挤时间写出一些投C刊的文章而拼成的论文却可以得到他们的认可。我觉得不公平。
大家是否觉得我应该反映一下而尊重自己的成果?(我百分百肯定地说我自己的博士论文是这个领域的开拓性的贡献!PS:我已经发表两篇国内权威,博士论文主要部分已经投稿JASA)
国外专家意见原话是:“he presented his core thesis ideas and introduced further ideas of his thesis to us. XXXX's ideas are fundamental in the field of Statistics and Copula theory. In particular, he developed a novel concept of local dependence that permits calculation of comovement within quadrants, thereby avoiding the problems of the standard, global copula measures. He not only developed and implemented this idea for the standard copula and Kendall’s tau measures, he also extended it to several other dependence settings. XXXX's very valuable for statistics and probability theory, as well as for applications in banking and finance.” “I was highly impressed by this concept and other research ideas of xxxxxx, and was pleased to guide his research over the past year, along with Professor XXXXXx. I have been doing research on copula theory for more than ten years and have published several papers in the area, and believe that XXXX’s work and insight are of excellent caliber. Recently, he has finished refining these ideas into a high quality paper, which represents a fundamental innovation in the copula field. We plan to submit it to a top journal in the field of Statistics.” 哥大专家评价是:"he is one of the most self-reliant PhD students I have worked with in my 25 years at columbia university"