完全复制A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison of Systemic Risk Measures的matlab代码,是发表高质量论文的极好材料。
Sylvain Benoit, Gilbert Colletaz, Christophe Hurlin, Christophe Pérignony
First draft: December 1, 2011
This version: February 14, 2013
Abstract
We propose a theoretical and empirical comparison of the most popular systemic risk
measures. To do so, we derive the systemic risk measures in a common framework and
show that they can be expressed as linear transformations of rmsmarket risk (e.g.,
beta). We also derive conditions under which the di¤erent measures lead similar rank-
ings of systemically important nancial institutions (SIFIs). In an empirical analysis of
US nancial institutions, we show that (1) di¤erent systemic risk measures identify dif-
ferent SIFIs and that (2) rm rankings based on systemic risk estimates mirror rankings
obtained by sorting rms on market risk or liabilities. One-factor linear models explain
most of the variability of the systemic risk estimates, which indicates that standard
systemic risk measures fall short in capturing the multiple facets of systemic risk.