楼主: 水浪
5079 57

中美两国就双边经贸磋商发表联合声明 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 42粉丝

大师

2%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
2
论坛币
299795 个
通用积分
15.1747
学术水平
1941 点
热心指数
1734 点
信用等级
1359 点
经验
289073 点
帖子
9402
精华
1
在线时间
6132 小时
注册时间
2005-3-17
最后登录
2022-1-7

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
2345截图20180520025131.png
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:联合声明 中美两国 双边经贸

已有 1 人评分经验 收起 理由
kongqingbao280 + 20 精彩帖子

总评分: 经验 + 20   查看全部评分

沙发
hhj 发表于 2018-5-20 11:23:42 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
在商贸部门一再强硬发声讲要不休一切代价去对抗美国贸易要求的时候,我就对此作了严厉批驳,并且,我一贯主张中国要扩大进口,因为我的基本观点仍然是:人民主要以消费者的身份获益。扩大进口,人民作为消费者就能够得到更多好处,扩大进口只是不利于垄断利益集团而已,但对人民是有利的。
    现今,国家顺应了历史潮流与人民的利益,同时也对那些愚蠢情绪者一个大大的巴掌。因为此类人根本搞不清东南西北,他们的愚蠢之处在于:本来扩大进口他们是得到大大的好处的,但是,仍然盲目的逢美必反。所以此类人我称之为愚蠢情绪者。

使用道具

藤椅
水浪 发表于 2018-5-20 11:24:27 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
根据000指示,高度重视,建设性!

中国官式自己声明?
联合声明?

使用道具

板凳
水浪 发表于 2018-5-20 11:37:18 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
读联合二字,再结合以前的交战
美国对这次谈会不会说?但我们会按一切原来的要求完成就可以,随便你中国发什么声明似什么样的声明都可以的,

使用道具

报纸
水浪 发表于 2018-5-20 11:55:32 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
为满足中国人民不断增长的消费需求和促进高质量经济发展

使用道具

地板
水浪 发表于 2018-5-20 18:41:02 来自手机 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
本人读来认为这不是联合声明,是自拟声明,
这种声明的深处更象是这边想妥协也没有机会了

使用道具

7
水浪 发表于 2018-5-20 18:41:34 来自手机 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
hhj 发表于 2018-5-20 11:23
在商贸部门一再强硬发声讲要不休一切代价去对抗美国贸易要求的时候,我就对此作了严厉批驳,并且,我一贯主 ...
本人读来认为这不是联合声明,是自拟声明,美现在是爱理不理,由你去自拟自说
这种声明的深处更象是这边想妥协也没有机会了

使用道具

8
johnshopkins 发表于 2018-5-20 19:21:25 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
没看到美国方面的任何申明,还需静观其变。

使用道具

9
johnshopkins 发表于 2018-5-20 19:30:37 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
China stops short of accepting US trade demands  
https://www.ft.com/content/480bb11e-5b15-11e8-bdb7-f6677d2e1ce8
Beijing willing to open up to more imports as administration backs away from ZTE resolution


Shawn Donnan in Washington and Tom Mitchell in Beijing
May 19, 2018   

Chinese officials have indicated their willingness to buy more US exports but stopped short of accepting US President Donald Trump’s demand for a $200bn reduction in their bilateral trade surplus, as the two sides failed to agree on relief measures for a Chinese telecommunications company hit by crippling US sanctions.

In a joint statement released on Saturday the two sides said they had ageeed on the need for “effective measures to substantially reduce” the US $337bn annual trade deficit with China.

They said that after two days of “constructive talks” China had agreed to “significantly increase” its purchases of US goods and services and on the need for “meaningful increases” in US agricultural and energy exports to China.


Beijing had agreed, they said, to amend relevant laws and regulations, including its patent law, to address US intellectual property complaints that have fuelled Mr Trump’s recent threats to impose tariffs on up to $150bn in imports from China. They also pledged to continue engagement to resolve their differences.

Separately, China’s top envoy, Liu He, told state media that both sides had agreed not to go ahead with imposing tariffs on each other, the state-run Xinhua news agency reported.

But Saturday’s vague statement did not mention telecommunications company ZTE and its lack of firm targets highlighted a continuing gap between both sides’ priorities.

The apparent failure came as political reaction forced the Trump administration to back away from a presidential commitment to resolve a dispute over ZTE, which was forced to suspend business operations after being banned from buying US components. Last year ZTE admitted breaking US sanctions on Iran and North Korea in a $1.2bn settlement that it then allegedly violated, according to the Department of Commerce.

Resolving that issue was the top priority for vice-premier Liu He, China’s top economic official, during his visit to Washington this week. Ahead of the trip Mr Trump had tweeted that he and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, were working to give ZTE “a way to get back into business, fast”.

But Mr Trump’s tweet provoked a backlash from both Republicans and Democrats in Congress who pointed to US intelligence agencies’ longstanding security concerns about ZTE. Politicians across the US political spectrum warned the president on Friday not to cave in to China.

“The president’s negotiating space has been shrinking with all the pressure that has been coming out of [Congress]. He lit a fire with that [ZTE] tweet,” said one person familiar with this week’s talks.

Larry Kudlow, chairman of the National Economic Council, insisted that ZTE would still face stiff penalties from the US and may have to change its board and management. “We’re not talking about letting them off scot-free by any stretch,” he told Fox Business in an interview.

Mr Kudlow also told reporters on Friday that China had committed to making more than $200bn in purchases from the US and made other concessions. “China has come to trade,” Mr Kudlow told reporters at the White House. “They are meeting many of our demands. There is no deal yet to be sure, and it's probably going to take a while to process, but they're coming to play.”


Chinese business & finance  

Invite from Chinese bank offers chance to meet Trump for $150,000  

Friday, 18 May, 2018

Some in Washington nonetheless greeted news of China’s pledge to help increase US exports sceptically.

“Why do US officials always fall for #China trickery?” Republican senator Marco Rubio tweeted. “If we don’t wake up & start treating this as a national security issue China is going to win again.”

People briefed on the discussions, however, said rather than agree to the deficit reduction target that the US had been seeking, the Chinese delegation would commit only to lowering tariffs and removing other trade barriers with a target of increasing US exports.

One person briefed on the discussions said the Chinese had been working on a package of smaller commitments including lower auto tariffs, which were first announced last month, in an effort to give Mr Trump a deal that he could present as a victory.

Chris Johnson, a China analyst at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said some Trump administration officials had also been wary of agreeing to a “mini deal” — trading ZTE relief for Chinese commitments not to target US agricultural exports — if there was no guarantee of a follow-up agreement addressing their larger concerns about China's foreign investment and industrial development policies. “There was a concern on [the US] side that the ‘mini deal’ becomes the ‘maxi deal’,” he said. “If you take that you might never get around to the structural stuff.”

A commitment by Beijing to import more US goods such as semiconductors would also drive a wedge between Washington and allies such as South Korea and Taiwan, whose chip companies export large volumes to China.

“I think China is winning the trade war,” said Eswar Prasad, a China expert at Cornell University. “You might well end up with China buying more stuff, but that is going to widen the rift between the US and its allies.”

Mr Trump’s earlier readiness to make a major concession on ZTE also would hurt America’s image as a country “governed by the rule of law rather than presidential whims”, he added.

Additional reporting by Archie Zhang

使用道具

10
johnshopkins 发表于 2018-5-20 19:31:52 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
申明还是没看到,但应该有这个申明,只是,美国还认为他们得到条件还不够,而我则认为我们让步太多。

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-4-24 02:09