博士论文中大段引用自己曾经公开发表的论文算抄袭吗？

当然不用算了，从理科来看，将前期发表的10篇左右的文章捏在一起，博士论文成形。别管什么国外，我在国外也呆着了，没那么严，总有些人喜欢拿国外来唬人，有什么意思呢？你想想，博士三年做研究，发文章，到最后，学位论文无非三年研究成果的集中体现，于情于理都合适。再说一遍，别总拿老外当神。

夸克之一 发表于 2010-1-20 21:17
算的。。按照西方标准，自己不可以把自己已经发表的论文不做任何修改的放在博士论文里，做标注也不可以。

1.自己使用自己的論文，應該不算是抄襲！

2.不過大大所提出的『自己不可以把自己已经发表的论文不做任何修改的放在博士论文里』，的確值得  樓主參考！因為博士論文注重原創性。

3.至於，要不要比照西方標準，當然是見仁見智。不過，中國古諺：「取法乎上」，似乎值得我輩思考！！

注明啊。。。那个就是你的WORKING PAPER，当然可以随便饮用

放抄袭系统能测出来了，引用的自己东西太多的话也不过关

american00 发表于 2010-1-20 21:34
当然不用算了，从理科来看，将前期发表的10篇左右的文章捏在一起，博士论文成形。别管什么国外，我在国外也呆着了，没那么严，总有些人喜欢拿国外来唬人，有什么意思呢？你想想，博士三年做研究，发文章，到最后，学位论文无非三年研究成果的集中体现，于情于理都合适。再说一遍，别总拿老外当神。

你自己回去看看手则再出来说话。。。自己发表过的文章如果引述在博士论文里，就跟其他人的文献一样处理。当你的文章在公开期刊发表过之后，它就属于历史文献，你要引用可以，但不可以原封不动的抄。这是基本规范。

我唬人干什么？你在国外呆着，我也在国外呆着，不然我说这些干什么。

我再说一次，如果你引用曾经刊发在公开学术期刊上的文章，其引用要求和其他人写的文献一致。

你理科的，我不知道你们写论文是什么格式。经济学phd论文现在一般采用3 essay的形式，假如一个phd这三篇论文全部发表过，你觉得可以把他们装订在一起，直接提交么？

发表论文和博士学位论文是两件事情。而且我可以很负责地说，在经济学领域，phd阶段第一很难发表文章，第二学校不鼓励发表。

某些人觉得我唬人，那我贴一点规范出来大家看看：

3.7. So-called "self-plagiarism" and recycling fraud:
Legally it is impossible under American law to steal from oneself. Therefore, because plagiarism is defined as theaft some people argue that self-plagiarism is impossible by definition. This is because people cannot steal from their own work. There are, however,circumstances such as insurance fraud when people defraud others by claiming that something they owned was stolen when it was not.

On the Internet Humanist Forum, professor Paul Brian of the University of Montreal argued that "self-plagiarism," or the recycling of an old work in a new guise, "is also a theft since the author leads the book-buyer to think that there is a new book of his on the market. The author is misleading his/her readers: to me, it is just the same thing as to sell a secondhand car while claiming it's a brand new one" (The Humanist Forum 7/13, 16 April 1992). Perhaps a better analogy is the used car dealer who changes a car's odometer to make it appear much less used than it really is. Such a practice is recognized to be illegal. So too "self-plagiarism" is fraud if not outright theaft (Brogan 1992:453-465). To avoid confusion here perhaps it is better to drop the term "self-plagiarism" and simply call it recycling fraud.

Recycling fraud must be carefully distinguished from the legitimate recycling of a writer's own work that to a greater or lesser extent everyone does. Although recycling fraud in academic publications is a gray area many universities implicitly recognize the practice as fraudulent by publishing rules preventing students from submitting essentially the same essay for credit in different courses. There are also rules against someone submitting the same graduate thesis to different universities. Among established academics self-plagiarism is a problem when essentially the same article or book is submitted on more than one occasion to gain additional salary increments or for purpose of promotion.

Like plagiarism the essence of recycling fraud is the author's attempt to deceive the reader. This happens when no indication is given that the work is being recycled and an effort is made to disguise the original text. The issue is one of the extent of the deception. Disguising a text occurs when an author makes cosmetic changes that cause the same article, chapter, or book to look significantly different when in reality it actually remains unchanged in most of its wording and its central argument. Changing such things as paragraph breaks, capitalization, or the substitution of technical terms using different languages that leads readers to believe they are reading something completely new is recycling fraud when such changes are the only ones an author makes to a text.

The extent of recycling is also an indication of recycling fraud. Academics normally republish revised versions of their Ph.D. thesis. They also often develop different aspects of an argument in several papers that require the repetition of key passages from an  original work. This is not recycling fraud if the work develops new insights. It is recycling fraud if the argument, examples, evidence, and conclusions remain the same without the development of new ideas or presentation of additional evidence. In other words it is recycling fraud when two works only differ in their appearance but are presented as separate and distinct works.

最后一段讲的是在phd毕业之后，把学位论文改成发表论文要注意如何防止作弊。“Academics normally republish revised versions of their Ph.D. thesis. ”

其中有一个很重要的原则，你使用过去自己写的文章可以，但需要有新的东西“new insights”。如果他们仅仅在形式上不同，而在实质上一样，是不允许的。

我要说的就这些，觉得这些条例是骗人的话，那就随便抄去。每个学校的严格程度不一样，但基本原则都是不允许抄袭。

1# xuehuiyuan
不算，整章都作为论文发表都没事，如果你能发核心更好。

12# 096001
回复楼主：不算抄袭！

但有个事情需要说明：在我们国家这种案例还比较少见，难以说出例子。但在外国，我大概知道两种情况，欧洲有些国家要求博士论文中的内容不能是已经发表的论文；但很多国家，比如美国、加拿大、澳大利亚等是完全鼓励的：也即，你可以每章论文都是发表过的，这样你的论文无论是在“开题”（confirmation）、或者答辩（final）时是很有说服力，而且肯定是优秀博士论文，没有老师敢否决你的博士论文（即便他可以提一些观点，但可能不需要你修改，英文能发表到高水平的会议和期刊的论文，是被同行认可的）；

当然以上情况是部分听我导师介绍，部分自己了解（本人现在是中国人民大学商学院博士四年级学生，方向是电子商务和管理信息系统）

我可以举个我们领域内熟悉的例子供你参考：A. Burton-Jones,2005年博士毕业于加拿大。其博士论文在毕业前每章基本上是国际顶级会议接受。后这些论文全部被国际top journal接受（如MIS Quarterly）。楼主可下载此人博士论文看看其每章下面如何备注的。


如您的导师对你的行为有异议，请你咨询相关专家或举出例证进行佐证。

在国外管理科学和信息系统这个领域里的期刊绝大部分属于SCI的，但是经济学是SSCI类，这两大类杂志的风格都不一样，背后反映的是学术规范和体系存在相当的差异。就我所知，在经济学、金融学和会计学还没有看到有博士生发文章，而且相关的文章还作为其博士论文的一部分；但是我看到有发表的文章在首页下注里说明是作者博士毕业论文第几章的，当然这种情况下作者只有一个人。

这个不是很了解！