| 所在主题: | |
| 文件名: 2012-11-22_美银美林_Banks - Hong Kong :Hooray for HK Banks.pdf | |
| 资料下载链接地址: https://bbs.pinggu.org/a-1217673.html | |
| 附件大小: | |
|
A confluence of factors, both economic and regulatory, has led to improving
fundamentals in the HK bank space. Loan growth will likely return to a more measured 6-7% YoY trend in FY13, down from FY11’s rapid 20% pace. Meanwhile, banking system liquidity is improving, allowing NIM’s to increase, though margins are far from FY08 levels. Asset quality remains benign and is unlikely to be tested severely in the face of a Chinese economic recovery. At the same time, banks have kept dividend payouts cautiously low, allowing capital to accumulate in preparation for Basel III. Fee income opportunities are abundant. Valuations attractive in sub debt, senior is rich Following the recent sell off in which BCHINA LT2 widened by 50bps, we have seen the re-emergence of value in the HK bank bullet LT2 space. Bonds are trading 30-40bps wide of normal relationships to HK corporates and offer good value versus similar rated EM banks, causing us to affirm our OW-30% on BNKEA and BCHINA bonds. We upgrade our recommendation on CINDBK 2020 LT2 bonds to OW-70% given improvement in core credit metrics, but remain cautious on DAHSIN given the rapid jump in China NPL’s in 1H12. We continue to see value in WINHAN UT2 bonds which offer 150-210bps pickup to callable LT2 bonds for a good credit. We add coverage of the CINDBK 2022 (call ’17) with an OW-70% recommendation, with bonds just -12bps inside 3 yr longer maturity bullet 2020’s. Senior bonds, however, are rich vs EM peers and implied recovery rates. We downgrade our recommendation on BCHINA 16’s to UW-30%. Basel III – Ready or not, here it comes HK’s has adopted Basel III and banks will need to be compliant from Jan 1st, 2013. We highlight key differences between HK Basel and the proposals from the Basel Committee in areas of unreleased gains/losses, deferred tax assets, connected party exposures and trade finance. Banks in Hong Kong will be required to include “point of non-viability” conversion / write-down clauses in the terms of their capital instruments, on and after 1 January 2013. The trigger point for principal loss absorption on new capital instruments complying under additional Tier 1 is when the CET1 breaches 5.125%. What would happen if Hong Kong’s property market busts? Lending to the property sector, in one way, shape or form, constitutes 15-43% of bank loans. We ask ourselves what would happen in the face of another market crash and how well capitalized are banks? In our view, BNKEA remains the most vulnerable followed by DAHSIN given higher exposure to property development loans. In our base case, we estimate NPL’s would rise to up to 4% of loans and in several cases, wipe out more than a year of pre-provision profits. Capital ratios are sufficient to prevent capital raisings immediately but could trigger coupon skips on the BNKEA Tier 1 (UW-30%). |
|
熟悉论坛请点击新手指南
|
|
| 下载说明 | |
|
1、论坛支持迅雷和网际快车等p2p多线程软件下载,请在上面选择下载通道单击右健下载即可。 2、论坛会定期自动批量更新下载地址,所以请不要浪费时间盗链论坛资源,盗链地址会很快失效。 3、本站为非盈利性质的学术交流网站,鼓励和保护原创作品,拒绝未经版权人许可的上传行为。本站如接到版权人发出的合格侵权通知,将积极的采取必要措施;同时,本站也将在技术手段和能力范围内,履行版权保护的注意义务。 (如有侵权,欢迎举报) |
|
京ICP备16021002号-2 京B2-20170662号
京公网安备 11010802022788号
论坛法律顾问:王进律师
知识产权保护声明
免责及隐私声明