| 所在主题： | |
| 文件名: Polinomial Model Harvey Goldenstain 4th Edition 2010.pdf | |
| 资料下载链接地址: https://bbs.pinggu.org/a-1470117.html | |
| 附件大小: | |
|
Dear list,
we have repeated measurements of persons, where we want to estimate a random intercept for each person. This random intercept is understood as an interindividual differences variable. In a subsequent step, the conditional modes/BLUPs of the random intercept should predict some outcome variable. We are aware that due to the shrinkage the random effects are driven towards the overall mean. Therefore we lose some of the interindividual variability which we actually would like to have. On the other hand, our within-person regressions are very noisy and based on few data, and we think that the partial pooling leads to better estimates, compared to an OLS-regression within each person. However, Reinhold Kliegl et al. (2010) write: "[…] one is tempted to carry on with the conditional-mean predictions based on the LMM parameter estimates to compute, for example, correlations with other background variables such as IQ or age that may be available for each subject. Unfortunately, however, this would be an erroneous step and would take the LMM-based predictions too far. First, given that conditional means represent a compromise between the subjects’ means and the estimate of the population mean, they must obviously not be treated as independent observations." Now my questions are: - How problematic is it to use random intercepts as predictor variables in subsequent analyses? - Do you know any other analysis where random intercepts (or something functionally equivalent) can be used as predictors? |
|
熟悉论坛请点击新手指南
|
|
| 下载说明 | |
|
1、论坛支持迅雷和网际快车等p2p多线程软件下载，请在上面选择下载通道单击右健下载即可。 2、论坛会定期自动批量更新下载地址,所以请不要浪费时间盗链论坛资源,盗链地址会很快失效。 3、本站为非盈利性质的学术交流网站,鼓励和保护原创作品，拒绝未经版权人许可的上传行为。本站如接到版权人发出的合格侵权通知，将积极的采取必要措施；同时，本站也将在技术手段和能力范围内，履行版权保护的注意义务。 (如有侵权，欢迎举报) |
|
京ICP备16021002号-2 京B2-20170662号
京公网安备 11010802022788号
论坛法律顾问：王进律师
知识产权保护声明
免责及隐私声明
