| 所在主题: | |
| 文件名: Preserve_or_retreat?_Willingness-to-pay_for_Coastline_Protection_in_New_South_Wales.pdf | |
| 资料下载链接地址: https://bbs.pinggu.org/a-3702168.html | |
| 附件大小: | |
|
英文标题:
《Preserve or retreat? Willingness-to-pay for Coastline Protection in New South Wales》 --- 作者: Ali Ardeshiri, Joffre Swait, Elizabeth C. Heagney, Mladen Kovac --- 最新提交年份: 2019 --- 英文摘要: Coastal erosion is a global and pervasive phenomenon that predicates a need for a strategic approach to the future management of coastal values and assets (both built and natural), should we invest in protective structures like seawalls that aim to preserve specific coastal features, or allow natural coastline retreat to preserve sandy beaches and other coastal ecosystems. Determining the most suitable management approach in a specific context requires a better understanding of the full suite of economic values the populations holds for coastal assets, including non-market values. In this study, we characterise New South Wales residents willingness to pay to maintain sandy beaches (width and length). We use an innovative application of a Latent Class Binary Logit model to deal with Yea-sayers and Nay-sayers, as well as revealing the latent heterogeneity among sample members. We find that 65% of the population would be willing to pay some amount of levy, dependent on the policy setting. In most cases, there is no effect of degree of beach deterioration characterised as loss of width and length of sandy beaches of between 5% and 100% on respondents willingness to pay for a management levy. This suggests that respondents who agreed to pay a management levy were motivated to preserve sandy beaches in their current state irrespective of the severity of sand loss likely to occur as a result of coastal erosion. Willingness to pay also varies according to beach type (amongst Iconic, Main, Bay and Surf beaches) a finding that can assist with spatial prioritisation of coastal management. Not recognizing the presence of nay-sayers in the data or recognizing them but eliminating them from the estimation will result in biased WTP results and, consequently, biased policy propositions by coastal managers. --- 中文摘要: 海岸侵蚀是一种全球性的普遍现象,预示着未来需要对海岸价值和资产(包括建筑和自然)进行战略管理,我们是否应该投资于旨在保护特定海岸特征的海堤等保护性结构,或允许自然海岸线后退以保护沙滩和其他海岸生态系统。在特定情况下确定最合适的管理方法需要更好地了解人口对沿海资产所持有的全部经济价值,包括非市场价值。在这项研究中,我们描述了新南威尔士州居民花钱维护沙滩(宽度和长度)的意愿。我们使用潜在类二元Logit模型的创新应用来处理Yea-sayers和Nay-sayers,并揭示样本成员之间的潜在异质性。我们发现,65%的人口愿意支付一定数额的税款,这取决于政策设置。在大多数情况下,以沙滩宽度和长度损失5%-100%为特征的海滩恶化程度对受访者支付管理税的意愿没有影响。这表明,同意支付管理税的受访者有动机将沙滩保持在当前状态,而不考虑海岸侵蚀可能造成的沙粒流失的严重程度。支付意愿也因海滩类型而异(在标志性海滩、主要海滩、海湾海滩和冲浪海滩之间),这一发现有助于海岸管理的空间优先顺序。不承认数据中存在反对者,或不承认他们,但将其从估计中消除,将导致有偏见的WTP结果,从而导致沿海管理者有偏见的政策主张。 --- 分类信息: 一级分类:Economics 经济学 二级分类:General Economics 一般经济学 分类描述:General methodological, applied, and empirical contributions to economics. 对经济学的一般方法、应用和经验贡献。 -- 一级分类:Quantitative Finance 数量金融学 二级分类:Economics 经济学 分类描述:q-fin.EC is an alias for econ.GN. Economics, including micro and macro economics, international economics, theory of the firm, labor economics, and other economic topics outside finance q-fin.ec是econ.gn的别名。经济学,包括微观和宏观经济学、国际经济学、企业理论、劳动经济学和其他金融以外的经济专题 -- --- PDF下载: --> |
|
熟悉论坛请点击新手指南
|
|
| 下载说明 | |
|
1、论坛支持迅雷和网际快车等p2p多线程软件下载,请在上面选择下载通道单击右健下载即可。 2、论坛会定期自动批量更新下载地址,所以请不要浪费时间盗链论坛资源,盗链地址会很快失效。 3、本站为非盈利性质的学术交流网站,鼓励和保护原创作品,拒绝未经版权人许可的上传行为。本站如接到版权人发出的合格侵权通知,将积极的采取必要措施;同时,本站也将在技术手段和能力范围内,履行版权保护的注意义务。 (如有侵权,欢迎举报) |
|
京ICP备16021002号-2 京B2-20170662号
京公网安备 11010802022788号
论坛法律顾问:王进律师
知识产权保护声明
免责及隐私声明