楼主: ahnulxy
420 2

[DSGE模型初级教程] The inflation bias under Calvo and Rotemberg pricing [分享]

  • 1关注
  • 60粉丝

教授

96%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
1
论坛币
10524 个
通用积分
2293.3528
学术水平
129 点
热心指数
158 点
信用等级
89 点
经验
45478 点
帖子
873
精华
2
在线时间
1379 小时
注册时间
2008-11-4
最后登录
2020-1-16

ahnulxy 发表于 2018-12-2 10:11:21 |显示全部楼层
Leith, C., & Liu, D. (2016). The inflation bias under Calvo and Rotemberg pricing. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 73, 283–297. doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2016.09.002
Working Paper(2014):
Accepted version(from SCI-hub.tw):  ,sci-hub.tw/10.1016/j.jedc.2016.09.002
Sciencedirect正文链接:http://www.sciencedirect.com/sci ... i/S0165188916301476
仅供参考

附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?我要注册
琅琅教育 www.longlongedu.com  
人生最大的杯具:白天看中国股市,晚上看中国足球!
stata SPSS
ahnulxy 发表于 2018-12-2 10:13:15 |显示全部楼层
Abstract: New Keynesian analysis relies heavily on two workhorse models of nominal inertia – due to Calvo (1983) and Rotemberg (1982), respectively – to generate a meaningful role for monetary policy. These are often used interchangeably since they imply an isomorphic linearized Phillips curve and, if the steady-state is efficient, the same policy conclusions. In this paper we compute time-consistent optimal monetary policy in the benchmark New Keynesian model containing each form of price stickiness using global solution techniques. We find that, due to an offsetting endogenous impact on average markups, the inflation bias problem under Calvo contracts is often significantly greater than under Rotemberg pricing, despite the fact that the former typically exhibits far greater welfare costs of inflation. The nonlinearities inherent in the New Keynesian model are significant and the form of nominal inertia adopted is not innocuous.
回复

使用道具 举报

ahnulxy 发表于 2018-12-2 10:30:40 |显示全部楼层
文章的核心结论:尽管Calvo定价机制呈现出更大的通胀福利成本,但其通胀偏差问题更为严重。
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2020-1-21 09:19