论我国刑事上诉制度存在的问题_法律专业论文范文-经管之家官网！

坛友互助群

扫码加入各岗位、行业、专业交流群

摘 要
在现代文明国家几乎都设有审级不同的上诉程序。上诉程序是继第一审程序之后的独立的诉讼阶段。它虽然不是每个案件的必经程序，但却是每个普通刑事案件所能达到的程序。我国刑事上诉制度在立法上还存在诸多问题，诸如，上诉不加刑原则保障不充分，立法没有赋予被害人独立的上诉权，上诉审中随意发回重审现象突出以及上诉审程序中，不开庭审理取代开庭审理成为原则，严重违背了我国的刑事诉讼立法精神。导致许多案件终审不终,反复重审，浪费了诉讼资源，同时亦损害了当事人合法权益，而且也损害了法院的权威性。刑诉法的修改并没有从根本上解决我国刑事上诉制度所存在的问题，本文以法学理论界对刑事上诉制度的探讨研究为背景，以司法实践中出现的问题为契机,运用比较分析和实证分析的方法,研究探讨了刑事上诉制度的基本原理,,阐释论证了我国刑事上诉制度的概念、特点、缺陷,以及为重构我国的刑事上诉制度提出了充分贯彻上诉不加刑原则，保障被害人的上诉权，严格限制发回重审的适用范围，贯彻开庭审理为主的审理方式，从理论和实践上为立法,司法解释,以及执法办案都提供了有益的参考.
关键词：刑事上诉制度 ，存在问题 ，制度重构

目录
摘要………………………………………………………………………… Ⅱ
Abstract…………………………………………………………………… Ⅲ
前言………………………………………………………………………… 1
一、刑事上诉制度的概述………………………………………………… 2
(一)刑事上诉制度的概念 ………………………………………………… 2
(二)刑事上诉制度在现代刑事审判中的地位……………………………… 2
(三)我国刑事上诉制度的特点……………………………………………… 2
二、研究刑事上诉审程序的意义………………………………………… 4
三、我国刑事上诉制度存在的弊病…………………………………………5
(一)上诉不加刑原则保障不充分…………………………………………… 5
(二)被害人上诉权受限，权益保障不充分………………………………… 7
(三)发回重审制度缺失程序规范的约束力………………………………… 8
(四)不公开审理成为普通原则……………………………………………… 10
四、我国刑事上诉制度的重构………………………………………………12
(一)充分贯彻上诉不加刑原则……………………………………………… 12
(二)保障被害人的上诉权………………………………………………… 13
(三)严格限制发回重审的适用范围………………………………………… 14
(四)以开庭审理为主，不开庭审理为辅…………………………………… 15
结论………………………………………………………………………… 17
参考文献…………………………………………………………………… 18
致谢………………………………………………………………………… 19

Abstract
In a modern civilized country there are almost instances different appeal procedures. The appeal process is the first instance in the process of an independent stage of the proceedings. Although it is not necessary in each case the procedure, but each ordinary criminal cases will reach the procedure. China's criminal appeals system in the Legislative Council still exist many problems, such as the appeal which does not aggravating the principle of protection is not adequate. Independent legislation does not give victims the right to appeal, the Appeals Tribunal Fahuichongshen phenomenon highlighted in the free trial and appeal procedures, not to replace the trial A trial principles, seriously violated China's criminal legislation spirit. Many cases do not lead to the end of Final Appeal, repeatedly retrial, a waste of resources, At the same time damaged the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, also damaged the court's authority. The amended Criminal Procedure Law has not fundamentally solve China's criminal appeals system where some of the problems exist, The paper sector to legal theory in the criminal appeal system for the study of the background is the judicial practice of the problem It takes an opportunity to use comparative analysis and empirical Analysis, study the system of criminal appeals to the basic principles, demonstration of China's interpretation of the concept of Criminal Appeals, features, defects, and for the Reconstruction of China's criminal appeals system to fully implement the appeal is not aggravating the principle of protection of victims ,the right to appeal. strictly limited the scope of application of Fahuizhongshen, mainly carrying out the trial of the trial, from the theory and practice of the legislative, judicial interpretation, and enforcement cases provide a useful reference.

Key words: criminal appeal system , problems , Reconstruction of the system

扫码或添加微信号：坛友素质互助

「经管之家」APP：经管人学习、答疑、交友，就上经管之家！
免流量费下载资料----在经管之家app可以下载论坛上的所有资源，并且不额外收取下载高峰期的论坛币。
涵盖所有经管领域的优秀内容----覆盖经济、管理、金融投资、计量统计、数据分析、国贸、财会等专业的学习宝库，各类资料应有尽有。
来自五湖四海的经管达人----已经有上千万的经管人来到这里，你可以找到任何学科方向、有共同话题的朋友。
经管之家（原人大经济论坛），跨越高校的围墙，带你走进经管知识的新世界。
扫描下方二维码下载并注册APP