伦敦大学哲学学习指导-经管之家官网!

人大经济论坛-经管之家 收藏本站
您当前的位置> 哲学>>

哲学书籍

>>

伦敦大学哲学学习指导

伦敦大学哲学学习指导

发布:magic/tp | 分类:哲学书籍

关于本站

人大经济论坛-经管之家:分享大学、考研、论文、会计、留学、数据、经济学、金融学、管理学、统计学、博弈论、统计年鉴、行业分析包括等相关资源。
经管之家是国内活跃的在线教育咨询平台!

经管之家新媒体交易平台

提供"微信号、微博、抖音、快手、头条、小红书、百家号、企鹅号、UC号、一点资讯"等虚拟账号交易,真正实现买卖双方的共赢。【请点击这里访问】

提供微信号、微博、抖音、快手、头条、小红书、百家号、企鹅号、UC号、一点资讯等虚拟账号交易,真正实现买卖双方的共赢。【请点击这里访问】

Guide,是伦敦大学给学生的哲学学习指南,主要是指导学生读书特别是写作的。非常有价值。如果哪个学生按照要求做了,一定很快就会成材。当然,也正因为如此,并不容易做到。但无论如何,在黑暗中自己摸索,不如秉烛夜 ...
坛友互助群


扫码加入各岗位、行业、专业交流群


Guide,是伦敦大学给学生的哲学学习指南,主要是指导学生读书特别是写作的。非常有价值。如果哪个学生按照要求做了,一定很快就会成材。当然,也正因为如此,并不容易做到。但无论如何,在黑暗中自己摸索,不如秉烛夜游,良有以也。
第一章名叫学习哲学指南。

1、如何读哲学(书)。开头就说“一生中任何阶段读哲学书皆非易事。有人称读哲学书足以怡情,但据说维特根斯坦发现读某些哲学书乃是一种痛苦。许多人倾向于同意他的看法。不管哲学家抱有多么好的意愿,想把他们的著作写得清晰易读,读来有趣,但结果几乎总是穿插点过时笑话
的更沉闷更晦涩的文字罢了。记住,读哲学不是为了一时的痛快,而是要让你离开时仍会有印象的。如此看来,使你对哲学的阅读尽可能高效,读有所值,就十分重要了。为此,面对文本,你必须保持既同情又批判的态度。要做到这一点,最好的办法通常是在读书的时候,心里想着些普遍
问题。一般说来,除非你能回答以下问题,否则你就不会从书本上得到你能够得到的所有东西。”
接下来,编者详细说明了七个问题:
作者想得到什么结论?
那个结论何以有趣?
其论证是怎样?
就其自身而言,其论证是否有效?
论证的前提应该被接受吗?
如果我们接受其前提和结论,那会得出什么结论呢?
最后,论证、论点这个问题是比较复杂的,不能一概而论。但无论如何,你都要保持同情之理解,批判之态度。Dong't just read: think。
2、写哲学文章:Peter Lipton说,风格是箭矢之羽,而非帽子上的羽毛。所以写作要
避免粗劣的文字,要我手写我口,用自己的话,还要让自己的文章念得出口。
要设身处地为读者着想。
要善于编排文章的结构
要有原创性
3、文献书名的引用注释规范。这就不说了。
4、剽窃(plagiarism)。剽窃的后果很严重。还举了个例子:
The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other: Bourgeoisie and Proletariat. Masses of
labourers, crowded into the factory, are organised like soldiers. Not only are they slaves of the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois State; they are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the overlooker, and, above all, by the individual
bourgeois manufacturer himself. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.
这是剽窃。
Marx and Engels noted that the history of all hitherto existing society had been the history of class struggles. Society as a whole was more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other:
Bourgeoisie and Proletariat. They observed that proletarians had nothing to lose but their chains. They had a world to win.
这仍是剽窃。
In The Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels (1973 edn., p. 40) noted that 'The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles'. They argued that society was 'more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two
great classes directly facing each other: Bourgeoisie and Proletariat' (p. 41). 'Masses of labourers, crowded into the factory' were 'organised like soldiers ... slaves of the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois State' (p. 52). They concluded that
'The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win' (p. 96).
这不算剽窃,可要是整篇文章都这样,说明你并没有理解这些观点,也就得不到好分数了。
In one of the most famous first sentences ever written, Marx and Engels (1973 edn., p 40) began The Communist Manifesto thus: 'The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.' They went on to exemplify this claim by
showing how the structure of society had, in their view, developed into two interdependent but antagonistic classes: bourgeoisie and proletariat. The latter comprised factory operatives, who had been reduced to no more than slave labour; but as they
became concentrated geographically, in the great factory towns of the industrial revolution, so they had the opportunity to organise themselves politically. Hence, the authors' conclusion that a communist revolution was not only desirable, but
possible, leading them to issue their equally famous final exhortation (p. 96): 'WORKING MEN OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE!'
这也许不是什么深刻的评论,但至少说明我尝试过!
5、哲学的一般性著作和系列。这些基础读本是有参考价值的:
Routledge Arguments of The Philosophers.
Oxford Readings in Philosophy.
The Blackwell Philosopher Dictionaries.
Cambridge Companions.
Blackwell Companions to Philosophy.
Routledge Philosophy GuideBooks.
The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. P. Edwards. Eight Volumes.
The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E. Craig.
如今这种著作大概因其市场销量好,所以剑桥、牛津、布莱克威尔、劳特利奇等大出版社竞相出版,花样百出,值得参考,但代替不了对原著的阅读!——这是我说的。
6、世界上的所有著作。这是对图书馆、电子图书馆和书店的介绍。

到此,本章结束。后面的22章介绍的是各个哲学分支的阅读写作指南。当然,这22个分支基本上也就是课程的主题,因此,这22章实际上就是课程论文写作指南。每一章都包括如下部分:论文的要求;基本阅读材料;核心的历史文献;主要领域、基本问题和相关文献。非常有实用价值。试
以第2章逻辑与形而上学为例:
1 The Paper:对逻辑和形而上学做了说明。
2 General Reading:十一部文选、六部专著
3 Topic:各领域的论题
A 语言与逻辑
a 意义与指称:相关问题与文献:
How does language relate to reality? How is it that words can be about things or refer to things? Referring expressions or singular terms, expressions which pick out a particular object, are normally divided into three categories: proper names
(‘Julius Caesar', ‘Rome'), descriptions (‘the conqueror of Gaul') and demonstratives (‘this', ‘that', ‘that city', ‘this emperor'). Names and descriptions need to be treated separately. (Demonstratives are treated in the philosophy of language
section of this Guide.) The standard reading for this topic is contained in the anthologies edited by Martinich and Moore mentioned above; there is an excellent introductory essay in sections 1 & 2 of Mark Sainsbury, ‘Philosophical Logic', in A. C.
Grayling, ed., Philosophy. There are short versions of writings by Mill and Frege, with commentary, in Chapter One of Reading Philosophy of Language, eds. J. Hornsby and G. Longworth (Oxford: Blackwell forthcoming). Frege's classic theory of sense and
reference is an essential theme. Frege thought that there are two aspects to the meaning of any term: its reference (what it applies to in the world) and its sense (the way in which the term presents its reference). So the two terms ‘Julius Caesar'
and ‘the Roman conqueror of Gaul' have the same reference but different senses. See Frege, ‘On Sense and Reference', in the Frege Reader, reprinted in Moore and in Martinich. See also Michael Dummett, ‘Frege's Distinction Between Sense and
Reference', in Moore and in Dummett's Truth and Other Enigmas, (London: Duckworth, 1978). For discussion, see Gareth Evans, The Varieties of Reference, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982), chapter 1; Gregory McCulloch, The Game of the Name, chapters 1&5;
David Bell, ‘Reference and Sense: an Epitome', in C. Wright, ed., Frege: Tradition and Influence, (Oxford: Blackwell, 1984) and ‘How “Russellian” was Frege?', Mind 99 (1990): 267-277; and Dummett, Frege: Philosophy of Language, (London: Duckworth,
1981) chapters 1, 5 & 6. For more on Frege see the section Philosophies of Frege, Russell and Wittgenstein in this guide.
b 摹状词:相关问题与文献
c 名称
d 条件句
e Existence
f 有效性与蕴涵
g 非形式逻辑
h 模糊性
B 真与主观性(以下兹不详列)
C 心与自然
D 必然性与分析性
E 同一性与实体
F 共相与殊相
G 因果性与规律
H 时间与空间
扫码或添加微信号:坛友素质互助


「经管之家」APP:经管人学习、答疑、交友,就上经管之家!
免流量费下载资料----在经管之家app可以下载论坛上的所有资源,并且不额外收取下载高峰期的论坛币。
涵盖所有经管领域的优秀内容----覆盖经济、管理、金融投资、计量统计、数据分析、国贸、财会等专业的学习宝库,各类资料应有尽有。
来自五湖四海的经管达人----已经有上千万的经管人来到这里,你可以找到任何学科方向、有共同话题的朋友。
经管之家(原人大经济论坛),跨越高校的围墙,带你走进经管知识的新世界。
扫描下方二维码下载并注册APP
本文关键词:

本文论坛网址:https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-881338-1-1.html

人气文章

1.凡人大经济论坛-经管之家转载的文章,均出自其它媒体或其他官网介绍,目的在于传递更多的信息,并不代表本站赞同其观点和其真实性负责;
2.转载的文章仅代表原创作者观点,与本站无关。其原创性以及文中陈述文字和内容未经本站证实,本站对该文以及其中全部或者部分内容、文字的真实性、完整性、及时性,不作出任何保证或承若;
3.如本站转载稿涉及版权等问题,请作者及时联系本站,我们会及时处理。
经管之家 人大经济论坛 大学 专业 手机版