发帖
雷达卡
摘要翻译：
本文讨论了公共研究机构如何消耗研究经费，应用了一种基于研究实验室经济代谢的新方法，与生物学进行了广泛的类比。这一方法被应用于欧洲最大的公共研究组织之一--意大利国家研究委员会--的一个案例研究。结果表明，该公共研究机构的研究经费（国家补贴和公共合同）主要消耗于人员成本。此外，分析表明，与政府总收入相比，公共研究实验室的人员成本不成比例地增长。在公共研究实验室预算缩减的情况下，这种组织行为产生了效率低下和压力。研究与开发管理和公共政策的启示，以改善经济绩效的公共研究组织在动荡的市场。
---
英文标题：
《How do public research labs use funding for research? A case study》
---
作者：
Mario Coccia
---
最新提交年份：
2018
---
分类信息：
一级分类：Economics 经济学
二级分类：General Economics 一般经济学
分类描述：General methodological, applied, and empirical contributions to economics.
对经济学的一般方法、应用和经验贡献。
--
一级分类：Quantitative Finance 数量金融学
二级分类：Economics 经济学
分类描述：q-fin.EC is an alias for econ.GN. Economics, including micro and macro economics, international economics, theory of the firm, labor economics, and other economic topics outside finance
q-fin.ec是econ.gn的别名。经济学，包括微观和宏观经济学、国际经济学、企业理论、劳动经济学和其他金融以外的经济专题
--
---
英文摘要：
This paper discusses how public research organizations consume funding for research, applying a new approach based on economic metabolism of research labs, in a broad analogy with biology. This approach is applied to a case study in Europe represented by one of the biggest European public research organizations, the National Research council of Italy. Results suggest that funding for research (state subsidy and public contracts) of this public research organization is mainly consumed for the cost of personnel. In addition, the analysis shows a disproportionate growth of the cost of personnel in public research labs in comparison with total revenue from government. In the presence of shrinking public research lab budgets, this organizational behavior generates inefficiencies and stress. R&D management and public policy implications are suggested for improving economic performance of public research organizations in turbulent markets.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.11932
京公网安备 11010802022788号
