20110515 Follow Me 5

FOLLOW ME   5,5
This article mainly talks about some effects of the policy adopted by regulators on investment banks ’ risk management. On the whole, the author debates that the policy may not easily separate good old-fashioned utility banking from its riskier cousins (investment banks) as it seems.
By realizing the great risk gap between the bank’s huge dealing on foreign exchange and bond-derivative products ,  cosmopolitan regulators  are taking the policy of using a mixture of higher capital ratios, limits in the risks that banks can take and restrictions on the pay and bonuses they offer employees to manage the astonishing risk of bond-derivatives. However, the policy mentioned above does not seem as good as it should be. We can illustrate the implicit logic by casting a few examples. One of these might be the extreme high capital ratio leads to the shrinkage of Switzerland big banks ,and it in turn makes these banks shrift business to American.
Ironically, another example comes that the restrictions on bonuses of investment banks employee may make investment banking even riskier. With a bigger share of salaries now fixed, earnings at European investment banks will become even choppier, and thus prompt them to move to U.S.
What’s more , other European banks have more reasons to move mainly because they faced a significant penalty when raising funds in such a unhealthy financial environments.

已经是跟我舞了，看来昨天错过机会了。

第一次参与，这篇文章很长，现在都块读不下去了

第一次看到，，以前没注意到，好帖。水平有限，一知半解，值得学习，再接再厉。好活动不能停止了

5/5
angels(天使基金), one of Venture Capital Investment.
The first paragraphs are a little difficult to understand, but the following are not so hard.
So just try your best and pay your attention to such english articles for a long time and you will know what they are on.
Hoho, so wonderful article it is!
Best wishes everyone!

3
今天这篇太长，决定打出来看~

2,2
Today's article is similar to yesterday, one on finance and the other on manufacturing, but they tell the same topic--enterprise movement. To achieve the equilibrium, there must be enterprises eagerly seeking for profit. This article showed us the action investment banks reflected to g.o.v's restriction. "Losses make us more cautious". After the crisis,the g.o.v seems to be smarter and more careful. Maybe it is time for the IBs' reduction of profit, but ,  as public could expect, they will soon move around the restricted rules.

Follow me：3, 3

5.5 感觉这次的生词多了不少

4,4
     First, i'd like to give my comments on yesterday's article here :
     Nowadays, for many multinationals labor costs are not the main factor to consider when deciding a production plant. Just as the labor costs continually rise, the labor arbitrage has begun to disappear little by little. And how to shorten the supply chain plays a big role in making more profits for these cross-national companies. Therefore, there’s no place like home in some way.
     For today’s article, the best thing for me is to learn new things. Yes , the new item for me goes to the “Volcker rule”. Irrespective of the Volcker rule, banks’ need to get rid of assets and unwind trades will be good news for many in the alternative-investment industry, because there will be less competition for returns.