拉贾斯坦邦的劳工改革：好事还是坏事？

是 否 +2 论坛币

k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

英文标题：
《Labor Reforms in Rajasthan: A boon or a bane?》
---
作者：
Diti Goswami and Sourabh Bikas Paul
---
最新提交年份：
2020
---
分类信息：

一级分类：Economics        经济学
二级分类：General Economics        一般经济学
分类描述：General methodological, applied, and empirical contributions to economics.
对经济学的一般方法、应用和经验贡献。
--
一级分类：Quantitative Finance        数量金融学
二级分类：Economics        经济学
分类描述：q-fin.EC is an alias for econ.GN. Economics, including micro and macro economics, international economics, theory of the firm, labor economics, and other economic topics outside finance
q-fin.ec是econ.gn的别名。经济学，包括微观和宏观经济学、国际经济学、企业理论、劳动经济学和其他金融以外的经济专题
--

---
英文摘要：
  We examine the impact of labour law deregulations in the Indian state of Rajasthan on plant employment and productivity. In 2014, after a long time, Rajasthan was the first Indian state that introduced labour reforms in the Industrial Disputes Act (1947), the Factories Act (1948), the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act (1970), and the Apprentices Act (1961). Exploiting this unique quasi-natural experiment, we apply a difference-in-difference framework using the Annual Survey of Industries panel data of manufacturing plants. Our results show that reforms had an unintended consequence of the decline in labour use. Also, worryingly, the flexibility resulted in the disproportionate decline in the directly employed worker. Evidence suggests that the reforms positively impacted the plants\' value-added and productivity. The strength of these effects varies depending on the underlying industry and reform structure. These findings prove robust to a set of specifications.
---
PDF下载：
-->

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

分享0 收藏0 回帖

关键词：Productivity Deregulation Quantitative Contribution Flexibility