楼主: yushengfan
4517 37

[财经英语角区] 20110612 Follow Me 33 yushengfan [推广有奖]

  • 6关注
  • 6粉丝

博士生

40%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
2197 个
通用积分
0.4800
学术水平
42 点
热心指数
60 点
信用等级
42 点
经验
5508 点
帖子
203
精华
0
在线时间
321 小时
注册时间
2008-11-23
最后登录
2022-11-18

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Why China May Prefer Lagarde
crt_lagarde_yang_G_20110610075132.jpg
As more revelations about French Finance Minister Christine Lagarde’s recent visit to China emerge, there are reasons to believe that she may have just secured Beijing’s backing for her bid to lead the International Monetary Fund.
Certainly, Ms. Lagarde herself seems optimistic. At a press conference in Beijing on Thursday, she said she felt “very positive” about the visit, while in an interview with the China Business News – her only interview with a Chinese publication — she said Chinese officials had showed “enormous interest” in her pitch for the post.
“Regarding my bid and my proposals, they listened very carefully. I think we are on the same page,” Ms. Lagarde told the Shanghai-based newspaper.
She may not be exaggerating.
Throughout her two-day visit, Ms. Lagarde adopted a conspicuously conciliatory tone on China’s sensitive currency issue, saying that one shouldn’t expect a revolutionary breakthrough on the reform of the yuan exchange rate, even though the yuan has actually fallen against the euro since China returned the currency to a “managed float” in June last year – and even though that stance is likely to go over poorly with U.S. Congress. She also hinted strongly that she would support Zhu Min, a former deputy central banker in China and current special adviser to the IMF’s managing director, playing a key role in the organization’s future top management.
In other words, she told Beijing exactly what it wanted to hear from a would-be leader of the IMF.
Beijing neither confirmed nor denied a unilateral declaration from Paris last month that China supported Ms. Lagarde’s candidacy. China has likewise remained silent on her recently concluded visit.
Despite that silence, there are reasons to believe Beijing may have already made up its mind.
While tangible economic benefits such as relief on the yuan and more prominent representation in the IMF are important, the decision boils down to the more fundamental question of who China trusts more.
Between Ms. Lagarde and Mexican central banker Agustin Carstens, her main rival in the race, one might expect Beijing to cast a brotherly vote for a developing world ally. But the trademark pragmatism that has dominated Chinese foreign and economic policy over the past 30 years suggests otherwise.
While the competition between Ms. Lagarde and Mr. Carstens may have been billed by some as a faceoff between old and new economic powers, that storyline oversimplifies the relationship between economies, particularly in the developing world.
The troubled Eurozone may suffer for having to account for its member states’ sometimes wildly different interests and cultures, but countries in the so-called “emerging market bloc” arguably boast even greater differences.
Take the currently popular BRICS grouping, for example. Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa all boast large and growing economies, but they have little in common otherwise, differing on everything from economic models and political systems to culture and religion.
A similar dynamic was at play in the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), a crowded and contentious grouping of third-world states founded in 1961 in response to the Cold War’s polarization of global politics.
While ostensibly united in their refusal to side with either the USSR or the U.S., many members of NAM were in fact quite closely aligned with the superpowers and a number were involved in serious conflicts with each other.
A lack of trust in the developing world means that on a bilateral basis, the relationship between an emerging economy and an advanced peer may often be much stronger than one between two emerging economies.
Between a declining but increasingly accommodating imperialist power and an assertive but wary emerging market rival, who will China support? Given Beijing’s post-reform foreign policy track record of putting economic interests ahead of politics and ideology, the choice seems clear. Europe, after all, is China’s largest trading partner.

周末愉快!




从今天开始,请跟帖坛友在评论留言结束处,标明OK, 表示第二天有时间选文发帖,以便我们选出the Best, 谢谢!

20110612  ERW Foundation  940
About the ERW Foundation  https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1114793-1-1.html




二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:follow Sheng Shen eng Fan 英语 followme 真经版

已有 13 人评分经验 论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
子君2011 + 1 + 1 不错~
mscontrol + 1 对论坛有贡献
julius333 + 1 + 1 不错的选文
whachel1976 + 1 + 1 + 1 Many good phrases in it!
gaper808 + 1 + 1 + 1 选文很好!谢谢分享!
cinbasky + 1 鼓励积极发帖
pheifan + 1 + 1 很不错啊,难度也适中
天津宝贝儿 + 1 还行!
cglee + 1 + 1 + 1 文章不错。
bengdi1986 + 1 支持!

总评分: 经验 + 10  论坛币 + 40  学术水平 + 9  热心指数 + 11  信用等级 + 11   查看全部评分

沙发
旅途8694 发表于 2011-6-12 08:21:59 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
33,33
沙发?

Christine Lagarde said she backed a bigger say for China at the Fund while making clear that the euro zone crisis would be a priority if she wins the job.
In my opinion, it is one important reason why China give her support for her IMF candidacy.
已有 1 人评分热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 1 + 1 呵呵,恭喜啊,我来图书馆前都没有公布呢,来了后,沙发你都做了,呵呵

总评分: 热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

只要相信自己所走的路,大步向前走就好,然后就那样成为一个能让别人带着笑容守望着的人。

使用道具

藤椅
eros_zz 学生认证  发表于 2011-6-12 08:23:38 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
大家积极为楼主评分

使用道具

板凳
周军杰 在职认证  发表于 2011-6-12 08:27:44 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
大清早的,支持下!
已有 1 人评分学术水平 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 1 欢迎常来光顾!呵呵

总评分: 学术水平 + 1   查看全部评分

使用道具

报纸
nkygwang 发表于 2011-6-12 08:52:26 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
good example!
Take the currently popular BRICS grouping, for example. Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa all boast large and growing economies, but they have little in common otherwise, differing on everything from economic models and political systems to culture and religion.
已有 1 人评分热心指数 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 1 鼓励讨论

总评分: 热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

使用道具

地板
nkygwang 发表于 2011-6-12 08:52:53 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
22,22
继续

使用道具

7
达濠仁 发表于 2011-6-12 08:57:13 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
33,33
我支持这位女强人!
已有 1 人评分热心指数 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 1 鼓励!

总评分: 热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

It's better bo burn out than fade away .

使用道具

8
bengdi1986 发表于 2011-6-12 09:02:05 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
33,33
本文有一些单词不好理解(只是对我哈,跟大家分享一下)
pitch  [pitʃ]
n.球场;强度;音高;沥青 v.扔;猛然倒下
conciliatory  
a.调和的
stance  [stɑ:ns, stæns]
n.站姿,立场
faceoff  
n. 倒角(对峙, 面对面的会议)
I believe that it is the first to put the economic interest ahead of politics and ideolgy between nations!

使用道具

9
2441414 在职认证  发表于 2011-6-12 10:05:01 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
A lack of trust in the developing world means that on a bilateral basis, the relationship between an emerging economy and an advanced peer may often be much stronger than one between two emerging economies.

OK
佛说:不可曰。

使用道具

10
超级健忘 发表于 2011-6-12 10:38:49 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
33,33

on the same page 意见一致
pragmatism 实用主义
As Lord Palmerston said, "Nations have no permanent friends and no permanent enemies. Only permanent interests."
Who China will support depends on not where he or she comes from, but how many interests he or she can bring.
已有 1 人评分学术水平 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 1 pertinent

总评分: 学术水平 + 1   查看全部评分

80 字节以内
不支持自定义 Discuz! 代码

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-5-2 01:40