大是大非！曹国奇 价值观信仰之争都只是借口，真正争的都是经济利益？

jesusman 发表于 2022-10-21 23:21
这样重要的历史事件为什么维基百科查不到
你说的头皮法案又是一个编造的谎言

在一千年内你所有祖先都是人类这样重要的历史事件为什么维基百科查不到？所以你是人（后代）看来是谎言了，让你再“有效”
=============================

能查到哦，维基百科中输入“人类起源”，可以很轻易地查到有关内容哦。北美殖民地时期的重要历史事件也都能查到哦。丑国历届ZF制定的所有法案（即使已废除）都可以轻易查到哦。

jesusman 发表于 2022-10-22 02:44
“黑奴法典”是一个系列，从1705年法典化最终发展到写入了宪法。

“黑奴法典”是一个系列，从1705年法典化最终发展到写入了宪法。
==============================

“黑奴法典”我在维基百科中查到了，确实存在但不属于宪法内容哦。但查不到“头皮法案”。说说看，你的历史资料从哪里来的？你主张你举证哦。

ynkylwj 发表于 2022-10-22 11:04
在一千年内你所有祖先都是人类这样重要的历史事件为什么维基百科查不到？所以你是人（后代）看来是谎言了 ...

我说的是“你”，呵呵

ynkylwj 发表于 2022-10-22 11:17
“黑奴法典”是一个系列，从1705年法典化最终发展到写入了宪法。
==============================

随便举个例子：1787宪法 4章2条：No person held to service or labor in one state, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service or labor may be due.

并根据此条衍生了之后的 Fugitive Slave Act

ynkylwj 发表于 2022-10-22 11:04
在一千年内你所有祖先都是人类这样重要的历史事件为什么维基百科查不到？所以你是人（后代）看来是谎言了 ...

你看wiki 没告诉你 黑奴法典包括 1787宪法中的一些法条，所以你就认为是说谎了，哈哈

ynkylwj 发表于 2022-10-22 11:17
“黑奴法典”是一个系列，从1705年法典化最终发展到写入了宪法。
==============================

Minnesota Bounties On Dakota Men During The U.S.-Dakota War

Colette Routel, Mitchell Hamline School of LawFollow
Document Type
Article

Publication Date
2013

Publication Information
40 William Mitchell Law Review 1 (2013)

Abstract
The U.S.-Dakota War was one of the formative events in Minnesota history, and despite the passage of time, it still stirs up powerful emotions among descendants of the Dakota and white settlers who experienced this tragedy. Hundreds of people lost their lives in just over a month of fighting in 1862. By the time the year was over, thirty-eight Dakota men had been hanged in the largest mass execution in United States history. Not long afterwards, the United States abrogated its treaties with the Dakota, confiscated their reservations along the Minnesota River, and forced most of the Dakota to remove westward.

While dozens of books and articles have been written about these events, scholars have largely ignored an important legal development that occurred in Minnesota during the following summer. The Minnesota Adjutant General, at the direction of Minnesota Governors Alexander Ramsey and Henry Swift, issued a series of orders offering rewards for the killing of Dakota men found within the State. The first order authorized the creation of a corps of volunteer scouts that would scour the "Big Woods" in search of Dakota men. They were to be paid not only a daily wage, but an additional $25 for each scalp they were able to provide the Adjutant General's Office. Subsequent orders permitted individual citizens who were not part of the volunteer corps to claim up to $200 for proof that they had killed a Dakota. These bounty orders remained in effect until at least 1868, when their constitutionality was finally questioned by the Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. Gut.

Minnesota was not the only state that placed a bounty on their Indian inhabitants. Around the same time, a bounty system was enacted by the Territory of Arizona, and one was also implemented by private citizens and local governments within the State of California. Like the bounty system in Minnesota, these programs were creatures of state and territorial law, but they were implicitly and explicitly approved by the federal government. In fact, they could be viewed as part of a much broader extermination program that was at the heart of federal Indian policy during this time period.

This article uses primary historical sources to describe the events leading up to the enactment of a bounty system in Minnesota, its creation, and subsequent on-the-ground implementation. In an attempt to avoid the pitfalls of "presentism," the legality of this bounty system is analyzed according to the laws in effect in 1863, when it was created. This article concludes that the Minnesota bounty system was illegal from its inception, as it was contrary not only the international law of war, but also the Lieber Code, which was issued by the U.S. Secretary of War in April 1863, and used to govern the conduct of Union soldiers during the ongoing Civil War.

Repository Citation
Routel, Colette, "Minnesota Bounties On Dakota Men During The U.S.-Dakota War" (2013). Faculty Scholarship. 260.
https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/facsch/260

上述内容里明确了1862年明尼苏达州“剥一个Dakota（印第安人）头皮士兵奖25刀，一般人奖200刀”，类似的赏金制度在亚利桑那、加利福尼亚等州的地方政府也有颁发，这些都是地区民选议员们制定的法律产物。头皮法案这种常识性的问题，这就像你的老祖宗也是人一样，wiki不告诉你所以你就认为是在说谎

jesusman 发表于 2022-10-22 13:55
我说的是“你”，呵呵

我说的是“你”，呵呵
=============

我的家族历史上没有出过什么名人，自然查不到啊。如果你的家族曾经显赫一时，肯定能查到，不信你试试。

ynkylwj 发表于 2022-10-22 21:29
我说的是“你”，呵呵
=============

你查不到等不等于说谎啊？

jesusman 发表于 2022-10-22 18:22
Minnesota Bounties On Dakota Men During The U.S.-Dakota War

Colette Routel, Mitchell Hamline Sc ...

上述内容里明确了1862年明尼苏达州“剥一个Dakota（印第安人）头皮士兵奖25刀，一般人奖200刀”，类似的赏金制度在亚利桑那、加利福尼亚等州的地方政府也有颁发，这些都是地区民选议员们制定的法律产物。头皮法案这种常识性的问题，这就像你的老祖宗也是人一样，wiki不告诉你所以你就认为是在说谎
=============================

这是一篇美国学者写的文章，文章大意说的是1862年明尼苏达州白人与达科塔印第安人之间的战争期间，达科塔人潜伏在森林中袭击白人，明尼苏达副官在州长的授意下发布奖励命令：志愿兵团在森林中搜寻达科塔人，每沙司一名达科塔人，除工资外再奖励25美元，可以用投疲证明，普通人如果能证明沙司了一名达科塔人，最多可奖励200美元。这些赏金命令一直有效到1868年，直到明尼苏达州最高法院在州诉古特案中最终质疑它们是否符合宪法才终止。

即使文章中的叙述都是事实，这些赏金命令也不能称为《头皮法案》吧，这些命令的目的是鼓励大家去沙敌，这就是战争行为，而且是交战双方都有的行为，波投疲其实是印第安人的风俗习惯，类似中国古代取敌人首级。这些命令后来不是被最高法院叫停了吗，说明这在当时的丑国就是一种违法行为。这些赏金命令从来就没有写入过丑国的法律中，又怎么能称为《头皮法案》。

jesusman 发表于 2022-10-23 12:20
你查不到等不等于说谎啊？

你查不到等不等于说谎啊？
================

这样著名的法案怎么可能查不到，查不到的原因只有一种可能，根本不存在。