楼主: whachel1976
2748 17

[财经英语角区] 20110813 Follow Me 94 whachel1976 [推广有奖]

11
yoyosuny 发表于 2011-8-13 13:34:16
你叫离在建核电站不远的人情何以堪啊,安全安全是最重要的啊!
已有 2 人评分学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
whachel1976 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论
桉树熊 + 1 + 3 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 4   查看全部评分

清净

12
Accountingfang 发表于 2011-8-13 15:55:08
there is a high cost for the high-speed rail stalls, but there is low benefit.
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
whachel1976 + 1 + 1 + 1 我很赞同

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

13
骆驼祥子 发表于 2011-8-13 16:38:20
enthusiasm for 热爱

fatal adj. 致命的;重大的;毁灭性的;命中注定的

infatuation n. 迷恋;醉心

prestige n. 威望,声望;声誉

extraordinary adj. 特别的;非凡的;特派的;离奇的;临时的

china’s latest five-year plan shifts from "energetic development" to "safe and highly efficient development," it is a vital way to go !
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
whachel1976 + 1 + 1 + 1 分析的有道理

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

远行的骆驼不怕满眼的黄沙,只怕心中没有绿洲

14
whachel1976 发表于 2011-8-13 16:47:26
In theory, we make decisions on the basis of high expectation of yields with low deviations. Risks should be evaluated before the project is put into effect. Bullet trains surely have brought about some benefits such as the global reposition of Chinese high technology and the showing off of the Chinese advanced manufacturing industry. However, many low-income civilians, for example, migrant workers, are unwilling to choose the new mode of transportation because they don’t think it is worth spending so much on fares for the not so necessarily high velocity. Maybe profit is not so good as expected, for bullet trains are not so welcomed and hence become popular among ordinary civilians. Besides, train delays and accidents bring some suspects on the problem of safety. To compromise a little on the speed and lower the cost may be a wise choice. On one hand, it increases the confidence on the safety of the train, and on the other hand, it will be more welcomed by citizens and may bring more passengers, thus increase profit or incur sentiment of happiness in the public.
As for the nuclear power plants, if it were not for the Japanese tragedy, most of us would think it was an acceptable means to provide power as it had been taken into usage for many years without big accidents. From the point of halo effect, for the moment most of us surely don’t want to take the risk of giving life to exchange for power, no matter how important that has been to our daily life and to our modern industry.
What is risk? The possibility of results that deviate from what we have expected and may bring about negative impacts. Nothing is for sure, but to determine in what degree to accept the risk is troublesome.

15
sinianriye 发表于 2011-8-13 18:29:26
I just read and don't comment.
已有 1 人评分热心指数 收起 理由
whachel1976 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

16
purplehairs 发表于 2011-8-13 20:14:51
Follow Me: 92, 55
已有 1 人评分信用等级 收起 理由
whachel1976 + 1 根据规定进行奖励

总评分: 信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

17
895720846 发表于 2011-8-13 22:17:25
maybe maybe
已有 1 人评分热心指数 收起 理由
whachel1976 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

18
summer0802 在职认证  发表于 2011-8-15 13:11:41
it seems that the government has never learned from the history of Great Leap Forward.
已有 1 人评分热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
whachel1976 + 1 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-27 20:54