楼主: 7yLwi41266
75 0

[其它] strongHexagonalstrong and Pruned Torus Networks as Cayley Graphs [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

本科生

6%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
253 个
通用积分
0.9251
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
390 点
帖子
38
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2021-11-18
最后登录
2023-9-4

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Hexagonal and Pruned Torus Networks as Cayley Graphs
Wenjun Xiao   Behrooz Parhami
Dept. of Computer Science   Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering
South China University of Technology, and   University of California
Dept. of Mathematics, Xiamen University   Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9560, USA
wjxiao@scut.edu.cn   parhami@ece.ucsb.edu
Abstract
Hexagonal mesh and torus, as well as honeycomb
and certain other pruned torus networks, are known
to belong to the class of Cayley graphs which are
node-symmetric and possess other interesting
mathematical properties. In this paper, we use
Cayley-graph formulations for the aforementioned
networks, along with some of our previous results on
subgraphs and coset graphs, to draw conclusions
relating to internode distance and network diameter.
We also use our results to refine, clarify, and unify a
number of previously published properties for these
networks and other networks derived from them.
Keywords– Cayley digraph, Coset graph, Diameter,
Distributed system, Hex mesh, Homomorphism,
Honeycomb mesh or torus, Internode distance.
1. Introduction
The fact that Cayley (di)graphs and coset graphs
are excellent models for interconnection
networks, of the types studied in relation to
parallel processing and distributed computation,
is widely acknowledged [1], [2], [4]. Many
well-known, and practically significant,
interconnection networks are Cayley (di)graphs
or coset graphs. For example, hypercube (binary
q-cube), butterfly, and cube-connected cycles
networks are Cayley graphs, while de Bruijn
and shuffle-exchange networks are instances of
coset graphs [4], [11].
Much work on interconnection networks can be
categorized as ad hoc design and evaluation.
Typically, a new interconnection scheme is
suggested and shown to be superior to some
previously studied network(s) with respect to one
or more performance or complexity attributes.
Whereas Cayley (di)graphs have been used to
explain and unify interconnection networks with
many ensuing benefits, much work remains to be
done. As suggested by Heydemann [4], general
theorems are lacking for Cayley digraphs and
more group theory has to be exploited to find
properties of Cayley digraphs.
In this paper, we explore the relationships
between Cayley (di)graphs and their subgraphs
and coset graphs with respect to subgroups and
formulate general results on homomorphism and
diameter formulas between them. We provide
several applications of these results to well-known
interconnection networks such as hexagonal torus,
honeycomb torus, and several other classes of
pruned torus networks.
Before proceeding further, we introduce some
definitions and notations related to (di)graphs in
general, Cayley (di)graphs in particular, and to
interconnection networks. For more definitions
and mathematical results on graphs and groups we
refer the reader to [3], for instance, and on
interconnection networks to [6], [8]. Unless noted
otherwise, all graphs in this paper are undirected.
Proofs are omitted here and will be provided in a
more complete version of this paper.

strongHexagonalstrong and Pruned Torus Networks as Cayley Graphs.pdf (3.07 MB, 需要: 22 个论坛币)
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Networks network Strong Graphs GRAPH

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-11-4 11:58