楼主: muhouxiaotian
4528 31

[财经英语角区] 20110925 Follow Me 138 谈教育 [推广有奖]

21
useranna 发表于 2011-9-25 18:18:15
我认为在我们国家目前首先要解决的就是教育公平问题,城市与农村,重点学校与普通学校的教育资源分配十分不公。
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
muhouxiaotian + 1 + 1 我很赞同

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

22
purplehairs 发表于 2011-9-25 19:42:24
Follow Me:135, 98

23
scofieldkang 发表于 2011-9-25 19:53:13
教育乃立国之本,兴国之路。中国目前的教育格局在一线、二线城市都存在严重不平衡。更不用说是农村的教育问题。农村现在处于从无到有的过程,而教育较为优越的城市应该努力过渡为高质量教育。而这一过程就中国目前来看至少需要30年,城乡统筹发展共求奋进的格局是必须的。教育动向牵动社会稳定,社会就业,整个国民经济。
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
muhouxiaotian + 1 + 1 观点有启发

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

24
cglee 发表于 2011-9-25 20:24:03
奥巴马9月24日电视讲话:强化教育振兴美国
President Barack Obama Weekly Address: Strengthening the American Education System
The White House September 24, 2011
Over the last few weeks, I’ve been making the case that we need to act now on the American Jobs Act, so we can put folks back to work and start building an economy that lasts into the future.
Education is an essential part of this economic agenda. It is an undeniable fact that countries who out-educate us today will out-compete us tomorrow. Businesses will hire wherever the highly-skilled, highly-trained workers are located.
But today, our students are sliding against their peers around the globe. Today, our kids trail too many other countries in math, science, and reading. As many as a quarter of our students aren’t even finishing high school. And we’ve fallen to 16th in the proportion of our young people with a college degree, even though we know that sixty percent of new jobs in the coming decade will require more than a high school diploma.
What this means is that if we’re serious about building an economy that lasts ? an economy in which hard work pays off with the opportunity for solid middle class jobs ? we had better be serious about education. We have to pick up our game and raise our standards.
As a nation, we have an obligation to make sure that all children have the resources they need to learn ? quality schools, good teachers, the latest textbooks and the right technology. That’s why the jobs bill I sent to Congress would put tens of thousands of teachers back to work across the country, and modernize at least 35,000 schools. And Congress should pass that bill right now.
But money alone won’t solve our education problems. We also need reform. We need to make sure that every classroom is a place of high expectations and high performance.
That’s been our vision since taking office. And that’s why instead of just pouring money into a system that’s not working, we launched a competition called Race to the Top. To all fifty states, we said, “If you show us the most innovative plans to improve teacher quality and student achievement, we’ll show you the money.”
For less than one percent of what we spend on education each year, Race to the Top has led states across the country to raise their standards for teaching and learning. These standards were developed, not by Washington, but by Republican and Democratic governors throughout the country. And since then, we have seen what’s possible when reform isn’t just a top-down mandate, but the work of local teachers and principals; school boards and communities.
That’s why in my State of the Union address this year, I said that Congress should reform the No Child Left Behind law based on the same principles that have guided Race to the Top.
While the goals behind No Child Left Behind were admirable, experience has taught us that the law has some serious flaws that are hurting our children instead of helping them. Teachers are being forced to teach to a test, while subjects like history and science are being squeezed out. And in order to avoid having their schools labeled as failures, some states lowered their standards in a race to the bottom.
These problems have been obvious to parents and educators all over this country for years. But for years, Congress has failed to fix them. So now, I will. Our kids only get one shot at a decent education. And they can’t afford to wait any longer.
Yesterday, I announced that we’ll be giving states more flexibility to meet high standards for teaching and learning. It’s time for us to let states, schools and teachers come up with innovative ways to give our children the skills they need to compete for the jobs of the future.
This will make a huge difference in the lives of students all across the country. Yesterday, I was with Ricky Hall, the principal of a school in Worcester, Massachusetts. Every single student who graduated from Ricci’s school in the last three years went on to college. But because they didn’t meet the standards of No Child Left Behind, Ricci’s school was labeled as failing last year.
That will change because of what we did yesterday. From now on, we’ll be able to encourage the progress at schools like Ricci’s. From now on, people like John Becker, who teaches at one of the highest-performing middle schools in D.C., will be able to focus on teaching his 4th graders math in a way that improves their performance instead of just teaching to a test. Superintendents like David Estrop from Ohio will be able to focus on improving teaching and learning in his district instead of spending all his time on bureaucratic mandates from Washington that don’t get results.
This isn’t just the right thing to do for our kids ? it’s the right thing to do for our country, and our future. It is time to put our teachers back on the job. It is time to rebuild and modernize our schools. And it is time to raise our standards, up our game, and do everything it takes to prepare our children succeed in the global economy. Now is the time to once again make our education system the envy of the world.
Thanks for listening.

已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
muhouxiaotian + 1 + 1 好!

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

25
muhouxiaotian 发表于 2011-9-25 20:31:36
cglee 发表于 2011-9-25 20:24
奥巴马9月24日电视讲话:强化教育振兴美国
President Barack Obama Weekly Address: Strengthening the Am ...
http://bbs.ebigear.com/forum.php ... 2533&highlight=   视频带字幕和音频

26
桉树熊 在职认证  发表于 2011-9-25 22:15:36
想起前阵子看的新闻,广州的天价幼儿园,其实由一开始便不平等了,本来说教育是尽量促进社会的平等,而现在却加速了不平等,有点能力的都把孩子送出国外了,我们这种没能力的就只能干瞪眼。
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
muhouxiaotian + 1 + 1 + 1 又是好久没见你了

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

27
xzhwsh 发表于 2011-9-25 22:51:59
赶紧占位子,不然断网了~~~~(>_<)~~~~
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
muhouxiaotian + 1 + 1 那么高的热情,必须奖励

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

28
whachel1976 发表于 2011-9-25 23:51:34
I agree with obilivion that here obama seems more likely a stone to hit two birds: transferring federal budget problem to the states while winning some votes from families with schooling age children.

As for China, I think the old education mode to win high marks in examinations is in fact a relatively fair way for children to compete. Nowadays, in modern cities, children's homework  is so difficult that even the whole family getting together have no ability to solve it. And the homework is not just limited to do some caculations or write some compositions, it ranges from programming to handcraft, from photographs to presentation, and even from dramatic performance to poem writing. The aim is obvious, to cultivate full-developed and versatile students. But sometimes it also tests parents' competences. And, how can students in rural areas get so colorful education?
In this sense, the standardized exam paper is a somewhat fair yardstick to evaluate children, I mean, not depriving poor students of opportunities  for further education.
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
muhouxiaotian + 1 + 1 前辈你说的好

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

29
whachel1976 发表于 2011-9-26 00:33:34
upend  [?p'end]   
v.竖立, 颠倒, 颠覆, 倒立
profoundly  [pr??faundli]
ad.深深地
legacy  [?leg?si]
n.遗赠的财物,遗产
overhaul  [??uv??h?:l]
v.& n.彻底检查,大修
revamp  [ri:?v?mp]
v.翻新,修改
superintendent  [?su:p?rin?tend?nt, ?sju:-]
n.主管人,监管人,负责人;警长
dismantle  [dis?m?ntl]
vt.拆开,拆卸;废除,取消
crowd out  
挤出, 推开, 排除
已有 1 人评分信用等级 收起 理由
muhouxiaotian + 1 热心帮助其他会员

总评分: 信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

30
lucy430022 发表于 2011-9-26 07:48:26
This does not mean that states will be able to lower their standards or escape accountability. If states want more flexibility, they’re going to have to set higher standards, more honest standards that prove they’re serious about meeting them.
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 收起 理由
muhouxiaotian + 1 + 1 有道理

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1   查看全部评分

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-9 16:17