应workhard等读者要求，何泺生教授耗费数周，克服输入中文困难，专门给我们写医疗改革文章

何教授，

1。WCU作为会计单位是没意义的，最终还是有汇率的问题，你的WCU在会计上不过是给美圆，人民币，英镑加一个注解，告诉大家这些个都是“货币单位”？
2。作为固定的购买力单位，美圆不就起这这个作用么？
3。如果是要成为和货币挂钩的对象，“汉堡包”或者“黄金”不就是起这个作用的么？
4。你说“WCU 的目的是量度"地球人"要买一篮子的世界生产需要动用多少货币, 不管是以美元,欧元,日元,等等算”，又说“每个国家可以因应自己的情况与WCU 挂钩，兑换率看本国的实际情况。这样每个国家都可以保存本国的货币，也可以按情况再有需要的时候调整挂钩的兑换率”—－－暂且不说这连起码的统计基础都没有。按照你的意思，是不是最后就是，买一篮子的世界生产需求要动用N个WCU，WCU=A美圆=B欧元=C日圆=.... 这不是多此一举么？

+gold coin

[此贴子已经被王平于2006-10-26 8:57:48编辑过]

刚注意到'何教授自己都说"不相信统一世界货币的构想有任何前途。起码在本世纪内，这个构想没有实际意义"。那这个讨论其实也没有什么意义了，期待教授你写出其他好的论文著作让青年学子讨论

thk u

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-9 23:48:57编辑过]

以下是引用世界上另一个我在2006-10-9 23:33:00的发言：

刚注意到'何教授自己都说"不相信统一世界货币的构想有任何前途。起码在本世纪内，这个构想没有实际意义"。那这个讨论其实也没有什么意义了，期待教授你写出其他好的论文著作让青年学子讨论

thk u

这是提醒大家不要望文生义，本文的世界货币单位不是世界货币，与欧元、亚元完全不同，更重要的是，希望大家看过论文再来发言。

何教授说：Many of those who wrote a comment on my work did not even take the time to read any of my papers, and simply wrote things that are based on impressions or assumptions. I think any fruitful discussion begins with a serious attempt to understand what others have to say and their analytical framework.

I have tried to answer patiently some of the queries, based on the wish to educate. But the main critic of the discussions so far is right in saying that these discussions lead to nowhere.

I however disagree, if there is such implication, that the work I have done is trivial or not important. My paper has been published in the World Economy, a respectable refereed journal and it is also cited in Robert Shiller's best seller: The New Financial Order.

I look forward to sound and well thought out criticisms.

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-11 11:48:35编辑过]

这些天没有上论坛错过了这么一个交流的好机~~~~太可惜了！

希望论坛以后经常举办类似的活动。

I am sorry. Last time, I did not read your paper completely, and asked some silly questions. After reading your paper, I think it is a very interesting paper, raising an important issue that is how to find a reference to measure and to compare the changes of real value after inflation under the diversified world monetary system. It seems to be an impossible task as Professor Ho said. However, we, scholars should have some big dreams.

Here, I have a question to ask after reading your paper. That is how to deal with the technical innovations, which also change purchase power and value, resulting in "deflation" if money supply is constant, contrast to the inflation of monetary policies. However, it is not mentioned in your paper.

The speed of technical innovations for different sectors, different countries and regions may be different.Of course, the speed may vary over time.Different from monetary policies, the paces of technical innovations are not predictable, therefore are not controllable.

Then how to incorporate the technical innovation into your models to measure the purchase power??

By the way,you said "我已经按2000年作为基础年算出了WCU 打从70年代初期到2004年的美元价."

It seems that discounted dollar can act as the roles as WCU....then do we need another WCU?

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-16 1:09:06编辑过]

我认为世界货币是一种趋势，但是这将是一个很长的过程，因为现今经济越来越与意识形态联系，而不同的意识形态必将对货币统一起到阻碍作用。亚元就面临这个问题。

+gold coin

[此贴子已经被王平于2006-10-26 9:01:33编辑过]

现在社会提倡多元化发展．世界各国的经济水平更是差距明显．所以我觉得根本没有统一世界货币的需要．

+gold coin

[此贴子已经被王平于2006-10-26 9:03:34编辑过]

外行发表的言论：如果这个世界没有美国，欧盟同一货币就不会统一了吧；如果这世界都听老美的，估计世界货币统一了.

+gold coin

[此贴子已经被王平于2006-10-26 9:06:32编辑过]

中国的汇率为什么“不敢”很快提高，主要原因我认为是中国的经济结构还处于不合理的阶段，加之政府的调控主导地位比较大的缘故！

+gold coin

[此贴子已经被王平于2006-10-26 9:08:30编辑过]

恩这个话题很有意思，但是世界货币的实行并非有良好愿望就行的，还有很多政治，财政，民族等复杂因素在内，想欧元的实现就是如此困难，并且他们还是有着相似的政治，经济，文化的前提下的，比较现实的是，先在有相似的地区实行区域货币一体化，然后看看能不能整和出一个世界货币出来。不过本人对此抱不乐观的态度，除非世界在政治上首先达到一统。

+gold coin

[此贴子已经被王平于2006-10-26 9:11:17编辑过]