楼主: lgwlgw
3794 20

[财经英语角区] 20120224 FollowMe 288 Income inequality : Who exactly are the 1%? [推广有奖]

11
happylife87 发表于 2012-2-24 09:42:11
That's why people are always complaining. Once a group dominates, it does not want to give away. I think only laws, regulations and the whole social system can help solve, but these are made by the rich.
已有 1 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 20 + 1 + 1 + 1 我很赞同

总评分: 论坛币 + 20  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

12
李何鹏 发表于 2012-2-24 11:20:17
It's has been a world problem for long time, the one who can solve it absolutely deserves the Nobel Prize.
已有 1 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 21 + 1 + 1 + 1 观点有启发

总评分: 论坛币 + 21  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

13
cglee 发表于 2012-2-24 14:31:49
The conclusions are somewhat out of expectation. They change my view of the 1%. It's an enlightening article, thanks.
已有 1 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 21 + 1 + 1 + 1 enlight!

总评分: 论坛币 + 21  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

14
tianliehuo 发表于 2012-2-24 14:32:28
       In 2011, America’s Gini coefficient is beyond 0.4, an internationally recognized alarming figure. However, China’s Gini coefficient is higher. In English-speaking countries, social and political may play a role. And in China, the results is in response in the growth of bureaucracies. As in
America, the membership in China’s 1% is also relatively stable.
      The Occupy Wall Street movement gives some trouble to the American government. And it also gives us a warning that we may get into trouble if the income gap becomes widen.
已有 1 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 44 + 1 + 1 + 1 补偿

总评分: 论坛币 + 44  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

15
challient 发表于 2012-2-24 16:40:31
中国两极分化严重啊。。虽然有点难懂,但是略知其中一些道理
已有 1 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 11 + 1 + 1 + 1 鼓励积极发帖讨论

总评分: 论坛币 + 11  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

16
apologize 发表于 2012-2-24 16:49:32
a index of gdp per capita  is much useful tool in economic society. in a paper issued by Forbes ranking, the us snathed 7th place~
已有 1 人评分论坛币 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
bengdi1986 + 22 + 1 + 1 + 1 我很赞同

总评分: 论坛币 + 22  学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

17
whachel1976 发表于 2012-2-24 20:51:13
Wealth accumulates in the few's hands, as what is described in this article, 1%. The disequilibrium should be balanced in some other aspects, otherwise the scale may turn upside down.

For example, in acient China,  in most common people's eyes, the emperors enjoyed extravagance and pleasure, need not worry about basic necessities of their own lives. But they had to worry about basic necessities of their constituents, or they would face the risk of being overthrown. The wooden stool they sat on was majestic, but it was so hard that to sit on with straightened back the whole day need special training, which was not all ordinary people could sustain.

For the 1%, they own absolutely high proportion of wealth among people, which makes them outstanding. Affectionate actions may need to balance the situation, no matter from the perspective of holding the belief to be involved in charities or pursuing some political powers.

18
gm125125 发表于 2012-2-24 21:53:00
英语呀,要花时间看了

19
众魔在人间 发表于 2012-2-25 12:02:31
whachel1976 发表于 2012-2-24 20:51
Wealth accumulates in the few's hands, as what is described in this article, 1%. The disequilibrium  ...
好帖子!

20
众魔在人间 发表于 2012-2-25 12:02:41
学习了!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-27 01:48