楼主: mu_lianzheng
1217 4

[财经英语角区] Bigger means cheaper [推广有奖]

VIP

院士

70%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
6
论坛币
470204 个
通用积分
28.8073
学术水平
1370 点
热心指数
1293 点
信用等级
1343 点
经验
70636 点
帖子
865
精华
24
在线时间
1408 小时
注册时间
2010-6-10
最后登录
2012-12-25

初级学术勋章 初级热心勋章 中级学术勋章 中级热心勋章 高级学术勋章 初级信用勋章 特级学术勋章 中级信用勋章 高级信用勋章 高级热心勋章 特级信用勋章

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Bigger means cheaper

It took eight months and more than 200 interviews. But on April 2nd America’s Federal Trade Commission (FTC) decided, in a three-to-one vote, to let Express Scripts acquire Medco. The two firms are America’s second-biggest and biggest pharmacy-benefit managers. Eventually, they may change the way Americans take drugs.

Despite an intolerably dull title, pharmacy-benefit managers (PBMs) are important. America is the world’s biggest drug market; in 2010 it spent more than $307 billion on prescription medicines. PBMs are the middlemen that manage drug costs for employers and insurers. Together, Express Scripts and Medco will control more than 40% of the market.

Express Scripts announced the acquisition in July 2011. Medco was a good company that had had a bad year, and so looked cheap. It had lost about 30% of its business in a few months as some of its largest clients ended their contracts. For both firms, bigger ought to mean better. With scale would come the power to negotiate fatter discounts on drugs, lowering costs for employers and insurers.

Pharmacists felt sick when they heard the news. PBMs encourage consumers to fill their prescriptions through the mail instead of going to a costly pharmacy. PBMs, pharmacists fret, will crush their fees for dispensing drugs. Worse, PBMs will demand that drugmakers give them exclusive deals for new, complex medicines. Competitors and consumers will suffer, the pharmacists argue.

The FTC disagreed. The merged firm is unlikely to squeeze pharmacies’ fees for dispensing drugs, it ruled. There remain plenty of lively, smaller PBMs. John Kreger of William Blair, an investment bank, says there is enough turmoil—thanks both to the merger and to Express Scripts’ continuing fight with Walgreens, a big pharmacy—that smaller PBMs may snatch new business in the next year. The small fry may also benefit if the pharmacy lobby’s lawsuit against the merger moves forward.

The combined firm will have $91 billion in revenue in 2012, estimates Lawrence Marsh, an analyst at Barclays Capital. It is so big that it could shape a new era for America’s drug market. As more drugs lose their patents, consumers will increasingly fill their prescriptions with generics. If Express Scripts has its way, they will also fill their prescriptions by post. Medco recently acquired a firm that compares the efficacy of different drugs. This may prove useful when America begins to see cheap copies of complex drugs, called biosimilars, which will be tested against the originals. The new Express Scripts may also play a role on Barack Obama’s new insurance exchanges, working with insurers to court individuals shopping for health care.

Most intriguingly, the new Express Scripts could push Americans to buy the right medicines and take them at the right time. For years PBMs have tested ways to urge consumers to buy cheaper, effective drugs. For example, if a patient wants a branded pill rather than a generic, he must pay for more of it himself. Experiments will probably scale up and become more sophisticated. Eventually, they might even spread to Medicaid, the public programme for the poor. Health reform (unless the Supreme Court strikes it down) will add 16m new members to Medicaid by 2019, a 27% jump. PBMs such as Medco and Express Scripts have so far spent little time chasing the Medicaid market. That may change.


了解Follow Us版
https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1130480-1-1.html
英文网址,欢迎补充!
https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1410923-1-1.html

Follow Us 发帖指南、常见问题及意见征集
https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1131076-1-1.html
关于Follow Us 版面建立官方群
https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-1212960-1-1.html

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Bigger means heap mean ans 公司 美国 interviews cheaper decided

已有 2 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
桶桶nancy + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
whachel1976 + 2 + 2 + 2 精彩帖子

总评分: 学术水平 + 3  热心指数 + 3  信用等级 + 3   查看全部评分

coffee
沙发
mu_lianzheng 发表于 2012-4-9 20:49:06 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
译文如下:
越大越便宜

花了八个多月的时间,会面达到200多次。但是4月2日,美国联邦贸易委员会以三比一的投票决定同意美国快捷药方公司收购美可保健。两家公司合并后将成为美国第二大药品公司以及最大的药品福利管理者。这两家公司的合并可能最终改变美国人购买药物的方式。

尽管标题无聊的令人无法忍受,但是药品福利管理者(PBMs)十分重要。美国是世界上最大的药品市场;2010年美国在处方药上的花费达到3070亿美元。药品福利管理是是平衡雇主和保险公司之间医药费用的中间人,快捷药方公司与美可保健一起将能控制40%以上的药品市场份额。

快捷药方公司曾宣布在2011年7月完成收购工作,美可保健去年情况不佳,看起来有点贬值,但美可保健是一个业绩不错的公司。由于一些大客户终止了合同,美可保健几个月内就损失了30%的生意。对两家公司来说,扩大经营必须意味着良好的收益。大规模将在药品折扣问题的商讨上占有更大的优势,并降低雇佣者和保险公司的成本。

听说了这个消息之后药剂师感觉并不好。药品福利管理者鼓励消费者通过邮件方式而不是通过花费过高的药品公司购买药物。药品福利管理者让药剂师们很头痛,药品福利管理者会把削减开处方药的费用。更糟糕的是,药品福利管理者要求药品制造上对于新药和合成药给与特别的折扣。药剂师认为竞争者和消费者都会遭受损失。

联邦贸易委员会并不这么认为。合并后的公司不可能压榨药剂师配置药物的费用,只是对此收费进行规范。市场中还有很多小规模活跃的药品福利管理者。投资银行William Blair的John Kreger说已经够乱了——多亏两家公司的合并,还有快捷药方公司与大型的医药公司Walgreens不断的竞争——小规模的药品福利管理者明年会抢走新业务。如果反对合并进程的药品游说诉讼能够成功的话,小公司也能从中获益。

据巴莱克集团的分析师Lawrence Marsh预测,合并后的公司在2012年的收益能够达到910亿美元。收益如此巨大以至于可以塑造美国药品市场的新纪元。由于越来越多的药品不再拥有专利权,越来越多的消费者都会使用非专利药物开具处方。如果快捷药品公司也采用此方法,那么他们也会采取邮寄方式开药方。美可保健最近收购了一家比较药品不同功效的公司。美国开始看到合成药剂的复制品,即生物仿制药,价格低廉,能用来与源药品做对比试验。此时上述收购还是极为有益的。新的快捷药方公司同样在奥巴马提出的新型保险交易中扮演了重要角色,他和保险代理人一起劝说个人购买健康保险。

最有趣的是新的快捷药方公司可以推动美国人在正确的时间购买正确的药物。几年来,药品福利管理者尝试新的方法以促使消费者购买便宜而有效的药物,例如如果病人想购买品牌药物而非一般药物,他要为多出的费用自己掏腰包。这样的试验将逐步扩大规模,也会越来越复杂。最终将波及医疗补助计划,该计划是救助穷人的公共计划。到2019年,健康改革(除非最高法院将其驳回)将增加160万名新的受益者,约增长了27%。像美可保健和快捷药方公司这样的药品福利管理者迄今为止在医疗补助计划投入的时间还不多。这种情况可能会有所改变。


已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
桶桶nancy + 1 + 1 + 1 辛苦了~

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

coffee

使用道具

藤椅
whachel1976 发表于 2012-4-9 22:32:52 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
After purchasing an enterprise which deals with the similar business, the fixed cost is expected to decrease, and more efficient employees will be reserved while those inefficient laid off, originating high profit scaled by assets, regardless of tax preferences for incorporating a loss company.

However, the absolute market share may result in monopoly, which doesn't mean lower cost will bring about equivalent lower price for consumers. As for this case, I think the government will strengthen supervision on it.

Besides, it is said in China, too many intermediary pharmaceutical wholesalers and retailers reap big profits, making the price of medicines go up scores of times above manufacturers' price. With the development of cybereconomy, will this situation change in the near future?
已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
桶桶nancy + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

使用道具

板凳
绵阳 发表于 2012-4-9 23:01:09 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
建议:

01.全文用一种颜色,非常单调,枯燥。请用不同的颜色标出关键的句子和陌生的单词。
02.请给出文章出处,方便学有余力或有兴趣的朋友进行扩展阅读。


参照例子:20120409 Follow Me 333 Like a bear in a China shop  by桶桶nancy
                       [本人觉得这个帖子做的很好,无论从字体,还是排版,甚至文章长短/题材都做得很好。]





已有 2 人评分经验 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
eros_zz + 60 + 2 + 1 补偿
桶桶nancy + 1 + 1 + 1 热心帮助其他会员

总评分: 经验 + 60  学术水平 + 3  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 2   查看全部评分

使用道具

报纸
桶桶nancy 在职认证  发表于 2012-4-10 09:30:40 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
The price of drugs has a close relationship with medical system. Medicine circulation efficiency in this field have a strong influence on the price. Our country's current medicine circulation field still have many defects, which produce adverse effect under cultivation period of the medical insurance system. adding the negative pressure to people for enjoying medical treatment.

the followed article analysis the present situation of our country medicine circulation field, based on the successful experience and put foward some relevant advice~
someone who interests can download or email u~


2011年基本药物数据统计.pdf

380.8 KB

谈中国药价备份.doc

187.5 KB

已有 3 人评分经验 学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
eros_zz + 60 + 3 奖励积极上传好的资料
端木杰Hyoga_Tun + 1 + 1 + 1 热心帮助其他会员
mu_lianzheng + 5 + 5 + 5 对论坛有贡献

总评分: 经验 + 60  学术水平 + 9  热心指数 + 6  信用等级 + 6   查看全部评分

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-5-1 04:30