楼主: defeniks
2146 0

[文献讨论] Guessing Games and People Behaviours: What Can we Learn? [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

已卖:168份资源

本科生

34%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
1351 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
736 点
帖子
71
精华
0
在线时间
12 小时
注册时间
2007-2-9
最后登录
2014-5-5

楼主
defeniks 发表于 2007-2-15 00:29:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
<P> 91698.pdf (155.56 KB, 需要: 23 个论坛币) <BR></P>
<P>In this paper we address the topic of guessing games. By developing a generalised theory of naïveté, we show how Güth et al..s result (i.e. convergence toward interior equilibria is faster than convergence toward boundary equilibria) is compatible with Nagel.s theory of boundedly rational behaviour. However, we also show how, under new model parameterisation, neither Güth et al..s story of convergence towards interior equilibria, nor Nagel.s theory of boundedly rational behaviour are verified. We conclude that the results of Nagel (1995) and Güth et al. (2002), however interesting, are severely affected by the ad hoc parameterisation chosen for the game.</P>
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Behaviours Behaviour Guessing People games compatible interior neither address towards

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-9 10:13