楼主: 金黄色的风
1202 0

[其他] 修正对冲基金收益的必要性:经验证据和修正方法 [推广有奖]

  • 4关注
  • 14粉丝

已卖:1546份资源

副教授

93%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
17743 个
通用积分
4.6763
学术水平
19 点
热心指数
19 点
信用等级
17 点
经验
35770 点
帖子
1014
精华
0
在线时间
664 小时
注册时间
2008-3-29
最后登录
2019-10-31

楼主
金黄色的风 发表于 2012-7-14 12:34:36 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
We study two principal mechanisms suggested in the literature to correct the serial correlation in hedge fund returns and the impact of this correction on financial characteristics of their returns as well as on their risk level and on their performances. The methods of Geltner (1993), its extension by Okunev & White (2003) and that of Getmansky, Lo & Makarov (2004) are applied
on a sample of 54 hedge fund indexes. The results show that the unsmoothing leaves the mean unchanged but increases significantly the risk level of hedge funds, whether the risk is measured in terms of the return standard-deviation or the modified VaR. Funds’ absolute performances, measured by traditional Sharpe ratio and Omega index, decline considerably. By contrast, funds’ rankings after the unsmoothing unexpectedly change slightly. However, some notable modifications in ranks of several funds are observed. The necessary transparency of the management practice requires that such a correction must be systematically done.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:修正方法 对冲基金 必要性 Modification Transparency literature principal 对冲基金 correct methods

The necessity to correct hedge fund returns empirical evidence and correction method.pdf
下载链接: https://bbs.pinggu.org/a-1144527.html

167.51 KB

需要: 10 个论坛币  [购买]

修正对冲基金收益的必要性:经验证据和修正方法

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jr
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-31 21:42