楼主: 现值指数484
358 0

[英文文献] Working Paper 327 - Poverty in Nigeria: A Multidimensional Approach-工作文件327... [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-19
最后登录
2020-9-19

楼主
现值指数484 发表于 2005-5-6 00:14:41 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Working Paper 327 - Poverty in Nigeria: A Multidimensional Approach-工作文件327 - - -尼日利亚的贫困:多维方法
英文文献作者:Zerihun G. Alemu
英文文献摘要:
This paper uses a multidimensional approach to measure the level of poverty in Nigeria and its distribution across zones and states. It examines the contribution of wellbeing indicators to average poverty and offers a tool to assist at various stages of project planning. The study finds the following: (i) Poverty in Nigeria is high, averaging52 percent, whether defined by income or by a combination of income and nonincome factors. This could be explained by the structure of growth and by the lack of pro-poor spending policies. (ii) Three geopolitical zones in the north–North East, North West, and North Central–account for most of Nigeria’s poverty. (iii) Higher average deprivation in some states could be explained by variations in service delivery. (iv) State-level variations in average deprivation are the greatest in education, dwelling, energy, and toilet facilities. Conversely, average deprivation is the highest but variations across states the lowest in employment, income, sanitation, and access to water. This implies that a combination of both state and federal poverty reduction policies are required. (v) Households attach more weight to education, energy, and employment, implying that interventions in these areas could significantly reduce poverty in Nigeria. JEL classification: I31, I32, I38

本文使用多维的方法来衡量尼日利亚的贫困水平及其在地区和州之间的分布。它审查了福利指标对平均贫困的贡献,并提供了在项目规划的各个阶段提供协助的工具。该研究发现如下:(i)尼日利亚的贫困率很高,平均为52%,无论是根据收入还是根据收入和非收入因素的组合来定义。这可以由增长结构和缺乏有利于穷人的支出政策来解释。尼日利亚的贫穷主要来自东北、西北和中北部的三个地缘政治地区。有些国家的平均贫困程度较高,可以用提供服务的差异来解释。(四)在教育、住房、能源和厕所设施方面,各州平均贫困程度的差异最大。相反,平均贫困程度最高,但各州之间在就业、收入、卫生和获得水方面的差异最低。这意味着需要结合州和联邦的减贫政策。家庭更加重视教育、能源和就业,这意味着在这些领域的干预可以大大减少尼日利亚的贫穷。JEL分类:I31, I32, I38
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-29 16:43