楼主: vividboy
2225 10

[休闲其它] 【the economist】美丽有错吗?不要在简历中放入照片? [推广有奖]

  • 4关注
  • 8粉丝

副教授

96%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
482 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
15 点
热心指数
22 点
信用等级
18 点
经验
50061 点
帖子
612
精华
1
在线时间
440 小时
注册时间
2009-4-9
最后登录
2017-9-14

楼主
vividboy 发表于 2013-4-14 16:23:06 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
经济学人上的一篇文章,挺有意思的。
OL: http://www.economist.com/node/21551535

简介:美丽的女性最好不要在建立中放入自己的美照,因为人力资源部的那群人(大部分是女性)可能因为嫉妒而让你丧失面试的机会。。。。。。
中国估计也会有这个问题。

原文:
AT WORK, as in life, attractive women get a lot of the breaks. Studies have shown that they are more likely to be promoted than their plain-Jane colleagues. Because people tend to project positive traits onto them, such as sensitivity and poise, they may also be at an advantage in job interviews. The only downside to hotness is having to fend off ghastly male colleagues; or so many people think. But research by two Israelis suggests otherwise.
Bradley Ruffle at Ben-Gurion University and Ze'ev Shtudiner at Ariel University Centre looked at what happens when job hunters include photos with their curricula vitae, as is the norm in much of Europe and Asia. The pair sent fictional applications to over 2,500 real-life vacancies. For each job, they sent two very similar résumés, one with a photo, one without. Subjects had previously been graded for their attractiveness.
      For men, the results were as expected. Hunks were more likely to be called for an interview if they included a photo. Ugly men were better off not including one. However, for women this was reversed. Attractive females were less likely to be offered an interview if they included a mugshot. When applying directly to a company (rather than through an agency) an attractive woman would need to send out 11 CVs on average before getting an interview; an equally qualified plain one just seven.
At first, Mr Ruffle considered what he calls the “dumb-blonde hypothesis”—that people assume beautiful women to be stupid. However, the photos had also been rated on how intelligent people thought each subject looked; there was no correlation between perceived intellect and pulchritude.
So the cause of the discrimination must lie elsewhere. Human resources departments tend to be staffed mostly by women. Indeed, in the Israeli study, 93% of those tasked with selecting whom to invite for an interview were female. The researchers' unavoidable—and unpalatable—conclusion is that old-fashioned jealousy led the women to discriminate against pretty candidates.
So should attractive women simply attach photos that make them look dowdy? No. Better, says Mr Ruffle, to discourage the practice of including a photo altogether. Companies might even consider the anonymous model used in the Belgian public sector, where CVs do not even include the candidate's name.



二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Economist economis econom Econo Econ 简历 美丽 照片

Welcome to the real world, it sucks! You gonna love it:)

沙发
stcome 发表于 2013-4-14 16:25:42
如果HR为男性呢?

藤椅
asdefg 发表于 2013-4-14 16:31:12
哈哈,看下

板凳
95252580 发表于 2013-4-14 16:33:31
额,丑的也放也很悲剧
有困难要上,没有困难创造困难也要上

报纸
vividboy 发表于 2013-4-15 09:03:51
stcome 发表于 2013-4-14 16:25
如果HR为男性呢?
那就得做好调查了。哈哈
Welcome to the real world, it sucks! You gonna love it:)

地板
vividboy 发表于 2013-4-15 09:05:45
95252580 发表于 2013-4-14 16:33
额,丑的也放也很悲剧
恩,是的。文章最后说匿名+无照片模式可能更加有效和公平,值得考虑啊。
Welcome to the real world, it sucks! You gonna love it:)

7
95252580 发表于 2013-4-15 09:12:47
vividboy 发表于 2013-4-15 09:05
恩,是的。文章最后说匿名+无照片模式可能更加有效和公平,值得考虑啊。
无照片一直是推荐的方式,匿名就。。。。。
有困难要上,没有困难创造困难也要上

8
95252580 发表于 2013-4-15 09:12:49
vividboy 发表于 2013-4-15 09:05
恩,是的。文章最后说匿名+无照片模式可能更加有效和公平,值得考虑啊。
无照片一直是推荐的方式,匿名就。。。。。
有困难要上,没有困难创造困难也要上

9
gazifjfz 发表于 2013-4-15 13:45:57 来自手机
支持不放照片

10
vividboy 发表于 2013-4-15 15:47:33
95252580 发表于 2013-4-15 09:12
无照片一直是推荐的方式,匿名就。。。。。
中国可能还好,似乎国外对于一些名字也有一些“隐性的歧视“,如俗语:plain Jane, 就是一例。
Welcome to the real world, it sucks! You gonna love it:)

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-4 11:43