楼主: Lisrelchen
1019 1

Which Methods Should Be Used? [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 62粉丝

VIP

已卖:4194份资源

院士

67%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

Bayesian NewOccidental

Spatial Data Analysis

东西方数据挖掘

威望
0
论坛币
50288 个
通用积分
83.6306
学术水平
253 点
热心指数
300 点
信用等级
208 点
经验
41518 点
帖子
3256
精华
14
在线时间
766 小时
注册时间
2006-5-4
最后登录
2022-11-6

楼主
Lisrelchen 发表于 2014-2-3 13:17:39 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Which method should be used when estimating multilevel model? Thanks
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Methods Should Method Which shou method should

沙发
农村固定观察点 发表于 2014-2-3 13:19:47
SAS gives you the choice of two methods for estimating the parameters in the analysis: maximum likelihood (ML),
which we have encountered before, and restricted maximum likelihood (REML). The conventional wisdom seems
to be that ML produces more accurate estimates of fixed regression parameters, whereas REML produces more
accurate estimates of random variances (Twisk, 2006). As such, the choice of estimation procedure depends on
whether your hypotheses are focused on the fixed regression parameters or on estimating variances of the random
effects. However, in many situations the choice of ML or REML will make only a small difference to parameter
estimates. Also, if you want to compare models you must use ML.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-3 03:34