楼主: chenyi112982
25440 179

[求职与职场] 【毕业季】不同专业在求职、工作待遇上的差异   [推广有奖]

回帖奖励 94 个论坛币 回复本帖可获得 2 个论坛币奖励! 每人限 1 次
31
研煎生 发表于 2014-4-12 03:56:28 来自手机

回帖奖励 +2 个论坛币

chenyi112982 发表于 2014-4-11 08:17
爱问频道毕业季专题1:【毕业季】学位是怎样炼成的?【爱问.舒疑】爱问频道毕业季专题2:【毕业季】保研生能 ...
值得关注的问题!

32
spapple 发表于 2014-4-12 07:05:09

回帖奖励 +2 个论坛币


支持楼主

33
xinquan2008 在职认证  学生认证  发表于 2014-4-12 07:07:14

回帖奖励 +2 个论坛币

说实话,楼主可能是生物专业,对经管还是不太了解~~~
就课程来说,不是说必须是跟数学有关的才是难学的。。。而且举几个例子,人大管科学的技术课程就不比计算机学院学的简单,同样的,中财金融的本科生,学习的数学也不弱于数学专业的学生,这是我一个学数学的同学去听过中财的课以后对我们发的感慨,类似的还有很多。。。
而就工作来说,金融等高收入行业的人的辛苦也是有目共睹的,空中飞人、7+12。。。。。。
已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
chenyi112982 + 20 热心帮助其他会员

总评分: 论坛币 + 20   查看全部评分

既自以心为形役,奚惆怅而独悲

34
谢王孙 发表于 2014-4-12 08:13:09

回帖奖励 +2 个论坛币

看一下

35
xiaodao99 发表于 2014-4-12 08:15:06

回帖奖励 +2 个论坛币

that s right. support

36
chenyi112982 发表于 2014-4-12 08:35:16
北上宣言 发表于 2014-4-12 01:03
已在6个不同的qq群推广。
计划奖励您300个论坛币,每个群50个,但每次只能奖100个,请再回复这个贴子两次,我来补偿
任何一种学习,就其本质而言,都是从提问开始的
爱问就有答案,酝酿好答案的感觉就像千年狐狸吐出内丹......

37
zhentao 发表于 2014-4-12 08:40:16

回帖奖励 +2 个论坛币

以这个帖子为基础,统计一下各个专业的毕业要求,第一份工作的平均工资等。

38
蔺鲁萍 发表于 2014-4-12 08:41:10

回帖奖励 +2 个论坛币

“只要你有能力,总能找到不错的工作”,不虚度年华,有一技之长,总会找到合适的工作

39
6851934lyy 发表于 2014-4-12 08:41:49

回帖奖励 +2 个论坛币

我怎么觉得工科的收入比经管高。。。感觉计算机的毕业生收入挺不错啊

40
cpamodeler 发表于 2014-4-12 08:55:48

回帖奖励 +2 个论坛币

I agree with the author.

The Chinese modern economy originated in 1980's. The gigantic unsatisfied demand created huge need for the economic and managerial undergraduate students.  At the beginning of 1990's, the first generation of domestic MBAs were produced from top Chinese business schools.  Those graduates were happy few.

The high salary attracts more and more top talents with other background to business world.
The return of investment is really high. No one doubts the fact. It is the truth, at least temporarily.

However, the competitive edge is embedded in innovation and execution.  The national power derives from scientific and engineering talents (investment finance is more likely to be an engineering and mathematical branch now).  They create REAL value in national life.

On the other hand, business talents are good at resource allocation. However, the skill is very easy to duplicate within a short term. Actually, it is a piece of cake for those STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) graduates.  That's why MNCs love applicators with quantitative background.  With little upgrading expenditure, the latter is able to take responsibility of the former.
However, the cost of reversing is prohibitive.  

So, in the long run, Chinese STEM students will regain its advantage position in HR market.
It's hard to imagine U.S.'s dominant position without its unparalleled  STEM advantages.
Those talents also enjoy the unparalleled compensation in U.S.

How long is it going to be effective in China?
I honestly don't know. It depends on national policy, national strategy and competitive priority.
It is a famous saying that "rare resource deserves rare payback".
Of course, in the long run, please.
Aren't we in an economic forum?
Thank you for your patience.






您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-31 20:49