楼主: Lisrelchen
1550 0

Whether I should use mixed model for my data? [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 62粉丝

VIP

已卖:4194份资源

院士

67%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

Bayesian NewOccidental

Spatial Data Analysis

东西方数据挖掘

威望
0
论坛币
50288 个
通用积分
83.6906
学术水平
253 点
热心指数
300 点
信用等级
208 点
经验
41518 点
帖子
3256
精华
14
在线时间
766 小时
注册时间
2006-5-4
最后登录
2022-11-6

楼主
Lisrelchen 发表于 2014-4-16 08:49:37 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Dear all,
I am writing to get your advice on my thesis data analysis.

I am analyzing what factors affect how much funding crowdfunding projects can attract. In my data, I have 125 projects and 10 pairs of these projects are created by the same creator (in total, 115 unique creators). So 10 creators in my data created 2 projects.
All my IVs are at project level though, i.e., duration of the campaign, # of funders, etc., even the tenure of creators is at project level since they will be different for every project. DV is at project level as well, i.e., how much money each project can attract.
Do you see a reason I should control creator effect? I ran a null in Spss with mixed model. I put creatorID in "subjects", and DV at the DV. Is this the right way to run null model in SPSS? If yes, the ICC calculated from covariance estimate is 75%, which I have a hard time to comprehend. 92% of creators have 1 projects, and 8% creators (10) have 10 projects, it is hard to believe that grouping has such a big effect.

Also if I need to run a mixed model to control for creator effect, do I just include creatorID as "subject" or "random effects" in SPSS mixed model?
Thanks for any tip.

Best,

Li

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:mixed model Whether Should Mixed model

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-18 10:04