Thank you for the constructive topic.
All the three opinions are true. I heard them from my friends separably before.
It is the truth that some papers are very constructive, some are not.
It is all depend on the producing process and motivation.
I believe the beauty of modern science and engineering is quantitative model.
Qualitative description could as beautiful as a poem, however couldn't as powerful as the former.
If you love your job, you can feel your passion; if not, you won't have confidence in what you are doing.
What's the goal of paper? of analysis? or of research?
Why there is a so called template for paper?
Yes, it is the essence of former intelligence. The best practice up to date. And if you are careful enough, you may find out the template isn't stationary.
One of my friend told me, he really want to create something new, something never exist before. That's why he keeps staying in the lab, doing research, and reading papers day after day, year in and year out.
"each paper is my son..." he told me, "I love them with my heart."
Yes, there is another kind of scientist or economist. Their job is to write paper no matter what.
That's the other issue I am not talking about.
Thank you for your time.
|