发帖
雷达卡
英文文献：Conferences As Field-Configuring Events – The Role Of Csr Expert Conferences In Constructing And Mainstreaming The Business Case For Csr-作为字段配置事件的会议——Csr专家会议在构建和主流化Csr业务案例方面的作用
英文文献作者：Tim Breitbarth,Donald Nordberg
英文文献摘要：
For many in academia and industry, corporate social responsibility (CSR) was long seen as a fad and fashion of transitory nature, similar to other management fashions (Abrahamson 1996). Results from empirical research into the business value of CSR were ambiguous (Weber 2008). During this time of widespread doubt, Academy of Business in Society (EABIS) president Gilbert Lenssen (2007) commented that the difficulty about the business case for CSR is a matter of ‘accepting’ the intrinsic link between CSR and competitiveness. Hence, this contribution draws attention to the role of CSR expert conferences in creating the business case argument for CSR and reinforcing its acceptance. Conferences and expert communities are important for the framing of management thinking and the configuration and evolution of new fields (Aldrich & Fiol 1994; Meyer et al. 2005; Lampel & Meyer 2008; Dobusch et al. 2010). The social element of expert communities and the physical element of expert conferencing require and inspire each other. They are institutionally bound, but publically indicate direction of how intellectual space is filled. The study draws on participant observation (especially natural occurring talk) and written conference material (e.g. promotion, photos, presentations, media coverage) of international CSR conference series in Germany during 2004 and 2008 – retrospectively, the period in which the modern idea of CSR started to spread and rise around Europe (Breitbarth 2011). The evolution of the business case for CSR occurred in three stages: creating momentum (2004/05), maturing the field (2006/07), and mainstreaming CSR (2008). Thereby, a more or less coordinated coalition of various expert actor groups translated the voluntary/normative nature of past CSR discussions into a modern business rationale.
对于学术界和工业界的许多人来说，企业社会责任(CSR)长期以来被视为一种昙花一现的时尚，类似于其他管理时尚(Abrahamson 1996)。对企业社会责任的商业价值的实证研究结果是模糊的(韦伯2008)。在这个普遍怀疑的时期，社会商业学会(EABIS)主席Gilbert Lenssen(2007)评论道，企业社会责任的商业案例的困难在于“接受”企业社会责任和竞争力之间的内在联系。因此，这一贡献提请人们注意企业社会责任专家会议在创建企业社会责任的商业案例论证和加强其接受性方面的作用。会议和专家社区对于管理思维的框架和新领域的配置和发展非常重要(Aldrich & Fiol 1994;Meyer等人，2005;Lampel & Meyer 2008;Dobusch等(2010)。专家社区的社会要素与专家会议的物理要素相互需要、相互激励。它们受到制度的约束，但公开地指明了如何填充智力空间的方向。研究了参与观察(特别是自然发生说)和书面会议材料(如促销、照片、报告、媒体报道)国际企业社会责任会议系列的回顾历史,德国在2004年和2008年在企业社会责任的现代思想开始蔓延,崛起在欧洲(Breitbarth 2011)。企业社会责任业务案例的发展经历了三个阶段:创造动力(2004/05)、行业成熟(2006/07)和企业社会责任主流化(2008)。因此，各种专家行动者团体或多或少的协调联盟将过去CSR讨论的自愿性/规范性性质转化为现代商业理论基础。
京公网安备 11010802022788号
