慎重选择博士后（或博士生）导师

有道理的

说的很有道理~

说的很有道理，赞同。

神贴，对我很有帮助！

Making a mistake in choosing your advisor can mean years of frustration。An advisor who has made his mark views the accomplishments of his students with pride, even joy. They are his research 'children.' Thus, other things being equal, an established professor is a superior choice for an advisor.A young advisor, trying to make his way in the world, does not want to be shown up by his student or postdoc. He has a lot to prove, and is unlikely to be generous with credit for ideas or progress.For the typical employer, a postdoc is cheap labor. Acquiring a postdoc is therefore much like buying a piece of laboratory equipment. One assumes that it will work for a while, helping to produce results. Then it will be replaced with a new model。但要挑到好的导师，谈何容易！

大约十年前曾经听一位教授说过，现在国内学术界存在着一种怪状，博士不博，导师不导，博导博导，一驳就倒。这些年看来，这并非完全是一个玩笑。

楼主，那可以谈谈怎样识别好导师与坏导师啊

很难
现在供给少
需求多

路过。。。。。。

"该书说，选有名的老教授有两个好处：一是有名的老教授有广泛的网络，并且处于学术网络里面的都是名人；二是功成名就的老教授不怕你超过他，不怕你和他竞争，相反会以你成为教授而感到光荣，把你当作他的学术产品。"

大部分同意，只是目前国内的很多大牛实际是大忽悠！