|
Buddy, it is depend on how you define your terminology of "深刻."
1.问更加深刻的问题：追溯本质的精神，抽象出最基本的概念；
Please tell us how do you know you have reached the so called "the most basic" concept?
"the most basic" implies stationary status, does the world cease to grow for your research?
2.逻辑、方法的优美：从具体到抽象，再由抽象到具体；
Truth is still truth, no matter you like it or not;
Lie is still a lie, no matter how beautiful it looks like.
3.广阔的视角：涵盖历史演变，包涵生产、交换、分配、消费诸多环节；
How wide is your vision?
Tell us your monopoly conduct?
Tell us your superior earnings with your notorious service quality.
Do you believe it is your so called equivalent exchange?
Tell us why there are so many abnormal transactions within your field?
Tell us how much a typical worker or a farmer makes annually?
4.经济模型的平实语言描述：不故作高深；
Come on buddy,
economic model?
how reliable is your data?
Is there any shortage of artificial interface?
how do you evaluate those noise in your model?
have you thought about it? or you just pretend you don't know about it?
how many insider transactions?
even if you find something special,
do you dare to publish your findings for normal people's well being?
5.辩证中力图揭示因果关系：决定因素与反作用力
Thanks for your "illustration", everyone knows what's going on.
Tell me what's the decisive factor for those low income families?
are they lazy?
are they not as smart as you?
Another issue,
"决定因素"与"反作用力" are parallel terms?
6.诸多问题的重点捕捉：把握住核心的关联
So what?
Do something for us.
Read the newspaper, you will find a lot of interesting core correlations.
Now tell us, is there anything under your control? under your "把握"
how you going to "把握"?!
7.人文主义关怀：不回避立场
We really want to see how are you going to make it?
What's called 立场?
How do you divide people into different groups? and
who qualified to standing on the other side of your "立场"?
In summary,
I don't think currently there is anything deserve to be called "深刻之处".
Thank you professor buddy.
| 
发帖
雷达卡
扫码
京公网安备 11010802022788号
论坛法律顾问：王进律师
知识产权保护声明
免责及隐私声明
