楼主: 一品帅锅
13037 89

[其他] 【辩论赛】油价过低不利于环保,你赞成吗   [推广有奖]

31
desaidey 发表于 2015-1-4 16:48:14
支持反方。
目前中国居民消费结构中汽油能占多少?算一下价格需求弹性,强过无谓的争辩

32
欺诈师p 学生认证  发表于 2015-1-4 17:59:23 来自手机
支持正方,因为欧美的汽车多环境好一是因为欧美地广人少。二是因为欧美的汽车注重环保,其能耗低于我国。三是因为欧美人对于油价的敏感度没有我国的高。油价涨跌不会引起太大用油量的变化。我国相对欧美有这方面不足之外我国油价降低将会引起新一轮的汽车购买高峰,致使总耗油量更高
已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
午夜的太阳 + 50 根据规定进行奖励

总评分: 论坛币 + 50   查看全部评分

33
dong0228 发表于 2015-1-4 18:01:46
【正方】能源价格过于便宜,大家用的时候无所顾忌,油用多了对环境破坏极大
【反方】欧美日汽车更多,油价更便宜,环境却很好。环保不能简单归结于价格
其实两方观点都有片面之处。仅就汽油消费来讲,油价低不一定会导致大家用油无所顾忌,关键取决于用油是不是刚性需求。如果我上班不需要天天开车,我并不会因为油价便宜而一定要天天开车,而如果我必须天天开车才能解决上下班的问题,那么油价高一点我也会选择开车;欧美日汽车多、油价低,环境却很好,其实环境好坏并不仅仅是汽车污染一种因素决定的,只有细分各种污染源对环境的破坏程度,才有可能得出正确的结论。
综合来讲,还是比较支持反方观点,即环保不能简单归结于价格,想用价格控制汽油消耗量来改善环境,想法是好的,但其作用恐怕不会大。
已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
午夜的太阳 + 50 根据规定进行奖励

总评分: 论坛币 + 50   查看全部评分

34
jiangweijiechu 发表于 2015-1-4 18:24:50
围观

35
CITSA 发表于 2015-1-4 22:41:17 来自手机
支持反方。加税是对拥有汽车者加重剥削。
1、汽车不是污染的主要原因,只是大家认定有汽车的人肯定有钱,可以多剥削点;
2、国内很多汽车性能不好,应加强汽车质量管理,而不是加税;
3、道路拥堵会增加油耗,增加污染,这其中有道路设计问题,也有道路的管理问题,电动自行车和行人随意行走而缺乏管理;
4、加的税用于何处?是否有监管?
相同国际油价下,中国的油价不算低,此外还要加上价格不菲的停车费与过路费、高速费,希望能对汽车拥有者手下留情
已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
午夜的太阳 + 50 根据规定进行奖励

总评分: 论坛币 + 50   查看全部评分

36
shihomeyee 发表于 2015-1-4 23:55:47
支持反方,技术是为了解决环保问题,而不是降低人们的生活水平

37
cooljunyu 发表于 2015-1-5 00:35:12
1. positive.
2. the dropping oil price may lead to a competitive market. if so, under this situation, it gives an incentive to the development of technology innovation in energy, particularly the renewable energy which generates little emission. also, in this century, as era of technology explosion, it is more likely that the renewable energy will gradually replace the traditional energy (oil, coal mainly) in the long run. that would cause that the oil price will go down in order to achieve more consumption, thereby increasing the income of oil companies.
3. psychologically speaking, people usually focus on the things that are harder to contain, but would give an ignorance or less concerns to 'the too-cheap-or-free' products. in the MASLOW HIERARCHY THEORY additionally, consumers probably will to buy the products with a higher price in order to capture the top of pyramid, or called self-esteem or self-actualisation (eventually to some extent, it is showing off). because logically most of consumers will consider that high price usually with a high level of quality. in the other word, lower oil price enables customers to think that the quality of oil may has been lowered. and for an instance, to drivers, especially the drivers who look their cars as babies, would say 'low quality will harm my baby'. then, drivers will possibly lessen frequency of using cars, reducing the volume of exhaust emission, or even climate changes. that is really helpful to environment.
to summarise, a decrease of oil price is more likely to reduce the using of oil, and it also will provide a positive competitive market which could stimulate advancement of technology of renewable energy. all of these will benefit environment.
已有 1 人评分论坛币 收起 理由
午夜的太阳 + 100 根据规定进行奖励

总评分: 论坛币 + 100   查看全部评分

38
xujingjun 发表于 2015-1-5 03:56:13
环境污染与与油价不是因果关系,只能说存在相关性

39
liyoujim 发表于 2015-1-5 08:16:55
没有关系的,和开采量有关,油价只是游戏的筹码

40
xinchuzu 发表于 2015-1-5 08:28:28
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-25 15:39