楼主: fuuser
842 1

[其他] VaR Back-testing_a short question (Urgent) [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

已卖:18份资源

大专生

10%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
747 个
通用积分
1.7000
学术水平
1 点
热心指数
3 点
信用等级
1 点
经验
717 点
帖子
35
精华
0
在线时间
38 小时
注册时间
2013-11-7
最后登录
2023-8-28

楼主
fuuser 发表于 2015-3-1 22:16:05 |AI写论文
50论坛币
Thank you!!!
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号?我要注册

最佳答案

no3621 查看完整内容

of course underestimate. 99% VaR can be understood by worst lose result when u simulate 100 times. Thus, here we can regard the question as 500 times simulating. If the 99% VaR is fair, then we should have 5 days which loses over 1. Actually, here we have 7, which can be interpreted as 98.6% VaR @ 1, or 99% VaR @ over 1.
关键词:question TESTING urgent Quest Short question

沙发
no3621 在职认证  发表于 2015-3-1 22:16:06
of course underestimate.

99% VaR can be understood by worst lose result when u simulate 100 times.

Thus, here we can regard the question as 500 times simulating. If the 99% VaR is fair, then we should have 5 days which loses over 1. Actually, here we have 7, which can be interpreted as 98.6% VaR @ 1, or 99% VaR @ over 1.

已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
fuuser + 1 + 1 + 1 Thanks

总评分: 学术水平 + 1  热心指数 + 1  信用等级 + 1   查看全部评分

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-1 17:13