打击柴静就应该做比她对更对的事情

回帖更精彩，，，看到不少敏感磁。。。

哈哈，名利双收。你们要学会换位思考，这既是需要一个勇气的做法

人类的本性就是一窝蜂,先是一窝蜂的炒作柴静,再是一窝蜂的批判柴静,这与资本市场的行为何其相似(同理,也可以应用到其他的现象上).
首先,我个人不喜欢炒作,炒作污染这种话题,我觉得很无聊.她的文章我都懒的看.
第二,我个人一贯认为,谁制造的污染就该由谁去处理,居民个人制造的那一点点排放根本及不上工业排放的零头,个人行为那是权利,别人无权干涉.工业污染损害了普通大众的权利,却要大众一起买单,我不敢苟同,我个人对于高碳低碳,完全看心情.因为那不是我们大家的义务,那是当局的义务.
最后我想说一下,与环保概念有关的,大家还是小心为好.

为天地立心，为生民立命，为往圣继绝学，为万世开太平！

xinchuzu 发表于 2015-3-3 14:20
柴静制造PM25了？我不知道，没听说过，请楼主拿出证据。
转型升级需要很长的时间吗？这可是喊了60多年了！ ...

1、制造2.5那是一种说法，我也没有看到哪里有过证实，只是认为即使她这样干了也具备评价的资格。别喊我哪证据呀
2、转型升级的时间问题嘛，目前确实很多问题，后面的事情谁知道呢。

xinchuzu 发表于 2015-3-3 14:23
楼主的这个帖子，前言不搭后语，根本不知他的观点到底是什么。

观点就是：标题

回眸明天 发表于 2015-3-3 14:11
完整看完了这个视频，我没有感到震撼，许多事情都因该是大众关注过或者知道的！

我赞赏柴静做这样的视 ...

"小伙伴们从经济学的角度来阐述一下自己的观点."
Thank you 回眸明天.

I believe the tone from the top is influential in this case.
Our government wants GDP decades ago.
It gets the result, also the relevant byproducts (esp. pollution).

Should it put emphasis on green development?
Based on solid evidence, I knew it tried (Since Hu generation).
However, the outcome would probably wipe out its benefit at current stage. (cost soaring, order plumbing, employment rate suffering, unrest underway, etc)
That may be the reason it aborted the project quietly.

I believe it's kind of sacrifice or reluctant trade-off.
Meaning, you know you are going to pay the extremely prohibitive price.
However, you have to do it.

In summary, it is one of the heavy cost of our lost time (since 1960's).
I am optimistic for our future, for our coming generations.

回眸明天 发表于 2015-3-3 14:11
完整看完了这个视频，我没有感到震撼，许多事情都因该是大众关注过或者知道的！

我赞赏柴静做这样的视 ...

"小伙伴们从经济学的角度来阐述一下自己的观点."
Thank you 回眸明天.

I believe the tone from the top is influential in this case.
Our government wants GDP decades ago.
It gets the result, also the relevant byproducts (esp. pollution).

Should it put emphasis on green development?
Based on solid evidence, I knew it tried (Since Hu generation).
However, the outcome would probably wipe out its benefit at current stage. (cost soaring, order plumbing, employment rate suffering, unrest underway, etc)
That may be the reason it aborted the project quietly.

I believe it's kind of sacrifice or reluctant trade-off.
Meaning, you know you are going to pay the extremely prohibitive price.
However, you have to do it.

In summary, it is one of the heavy cost of our lost time (since 1960's).
I am optimistic for our future, for our coming generations.

就新闻学的角度而言  柴静的此视频选材并不新颖   且穹顶之下这个题目也是照搬一部美剧的名称  何必如此争论不休呢

      水，空气，粮食！不仅仅是人类这种所谓“高级动物”生存之必须。任何经济发展不仅仅体现于成果也需要付出代价！在近几十年的所谓经济发展奇迹过程中，成果是什么？代价是什么？可笑的是严重的雾霾使人的正常呼吸需要带上口罩这个面具，把真面孔藏起来！！！