楼主: Johneven
1813 2

[其它] 一道微观经济学的题目 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

初中生

28%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
20 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
162 点
帖子
19
精华
0
在线时间
2 小时
注册时间
2008-11-27
最后登录
2009-9-3

楼主
Johneven 发表于 2008-12-1 04:32:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
有谁能帮我解决下面的题目,谢谢!
Once upon a time, students in economics received no grades and worked only for
the pleasure of learning. In those days of yore, each student received cardinal utility G(x)
from working at the level of effort of x hours per day.

(i) At what level of effort did each student choose to work?
Then one dark day, grades were introduced. Now each student cares not only about
learning, but also about his relative standing in the class. If y is the average hours worked
per day by all the students, each student now has a utility function of the form:
G(x) + F(x/y)

where F' (.) > 0 and F (1) = 0
In this modern era, each student maximizes his utility with respect to the variable under
his own control, x, for a given level of y.
(ii) What are the equilibrium values of x, y, and utility?
Suppose now all students get together and hire a consultant to plan for the socially
optimal level of work.
(iii) What is the socially optimal value of x, and how does this differ from the decentralized
case above?
(iv) Why is it difficult for the students to reach this solution by individual choice of
work, without collusion or coercion?
(v) If hours of work were publicly measurable, how could the socially optimal solution
be achieved by quota or a tax/subsidy scheme?

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:微观经济学 微观经济 经济学 equilibrium centralized learning received relative average 经济学

沙发
wangandzy 发表于 2008-12-1 11:25:00
请问此题的出处?

藤椅
Johneven 发表于 2008-12-2 06:44:00
这是我老师出的一道题,出自哪里还没有查过。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-30 01:54