楼主: ljjqjy
1014 1

[学科前沿] Guidelines Regarding Empirical Research in top Journal SMJ [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

高中生

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
37 个
通用积分
22.5589
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
314 点
帖子
15
精华
0
在线时间
9 小时
注册时间
2010-7-14
最后登录
2020-8-4

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
The Strategic Management Journal seeks to publish the highest quality research with questions, evidence and conclusions that are relevant to strategic management and engaging to strategic management scholars. We receive manuscripts with a diverse mix of topics, framings, and methods, and our acceptances reflect this diversity. More specifically, the Strategic Management Journal seeks to publish papers that develop and/or test theory, replicate prior studies, explore interesting phenomena, and evaluate the many methodologies used in our field. SMJ also publishes studies that demonstrate a lack of statistical support in a particular sample for specific hypotheses or research propositions. We welcome a diverse range of researcher methods and are open to papers that rely on statistical inference, qualitative studies, conceptual models, computational models and various kinds of mathematical models.

Guidelines Regarding Empirical Research in SMJ

Reporting Results of Statistical Analyses


SMJ no longer accepts papers for publication that report or refer to cutoff levels of statistical significance (p-values). In statistical studies, authors should report either standard errors or exact p-values (without asterisks) or both, and should interpret these values appropriately in the text. Rather than referring to specific cutoff points, the discussion could report confidence intervals, explain the standard errors and/or the probability of observing the results in the particular sample, and assess the implications for the research questions or hypotheses tested.


SMJ also now requires in papers accepted for publication that authors explicitly discuss and interpret effect sizes of relevant estimated coefficients.
As of January 1, 2016, new submissions that do not conform to these policies will be returned to the authors for revision prior to review. The SMJ editorial on “Creating Repeatable Cumulative Knowledge in Strategic Management” (2016, available online at the SMJ Wiley Online website prior to publication) provides more detailed explanation of these policies.


Replication Studies and Studies that Report “Non-results”


SMJ publishes and welcomes submissions of replication studies. Additional guidelines will be provided in the SMJspecial issue on replication. SMJ publishes and welcomes submissions of studies with non-results. These types of studies demonstrate a lack of statistical support in a particular sample for specific hypotheses or research propositions. Such hypotheses or propositions should be straightforward and logical. Studies should be conducted rigorously and assess the robustness of the non-results, such as robustness to alternative measurement, statistical specifications and estimation methodologies.


Causal Inference


SMJ strongly supports research that seeks to address interesting and important questions in strategic management that involve complicated causal processes. SMJ recognizes that statistical analyses relevant to these questions may raise the issue of endogeneity. If relevant, authors should acknowledge this issue in submitted manuscripts, and make a good faith effort to address it. In some cases, causal inference may be impossible, but statistical correlations, especially if used to rule out some alternative
hypotheses or mechanisms, may still be of interest. The SMJ editorial on “Quantitative Empirical Analysis in Strategic Management” (2014, volume 35: 949-953) provides more detailed explanation.

Data Snooping and P-hacking

SMJ strongly disapproves of data snooping and p-hacking practices in empirical research. Authors of submitted papers should not search databases for statistically significant coefficients with the intention of subsequently formulating hypotheses that fit the significant coefficients. Authors also should not adapt experimental designs with the primary intention of producing statistically significant results. In addition, authors of submitted papers should address the material significance (magnitude) of the results, in addition to statistical significance.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Guidelines guideline Empirical regarding Research Journal

Bettis-2016-Creating repeatable cumulative kno.pdf

224.28 KB

需要: 2 个论坛币  [购买]

Guidelines Regarding Empirical Research in top Journal: Strategic Management Journal

Bettis-2014-Quantitative empirical analysis in.pdf

214.16 KB

需要: 2 个论坛币  [购买]

Guidelines Regarding Empirical Research in top Journal: Strategic Management Journal

沙发
ljjqjy 发表于 2016-5-10 14:46:13 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
版主,申请奖励

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-5-9 15:01