[其他] 学区房该不该买 , 计量经济学告诉你! [推广有奖]

31楼

liudcssx

发表于 2016-7-21 09:06:19

这个微信公众号搜索不到

32楼

安然2016 发表于 2016-7-21 09:06:29

novice07 发表于 2016-7-21 08:57
中国买学区房是为了指标，孩子成长环境未必会得到明显改变，因此是否有效果并不能简单确定。

33楼

makan2009 发表于 2016-7-21 09:24:21

学习一下

34楼

hdflhj 发表于 2016-7-21 10:18:53

转载EJMR:

[We estimate whether walking burns calories and causes individuals to lose weight. Using Pokemon Go as an instrument for miles walked, we find that exercise reduces one’s body mass index. The effects are largest for individuals who weigh the most in the baseline and for Hispanics. Initial estimates indicate that one hour of Pokemon Go will increase future income by $3,652 per year.]

The abstract perfectly encapsulates the sterility and triviality of the cute-onomics that has overwhelmed the empirical side of the economics profession, down to the way its title “Blah Blah Blah: Evidence from Blah Blah Blah” reflects the papers that now get published in top journals. Look at the current issue of the American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, where 6 of the 10 papers religiously follow the template. (Thank you, you know who, for pointing this out to me months ago). I am certain that the Pokemon Go natural experiment will provide very precise estimates of a totally irrelevant economic question.

Some advice to the young bro or broette who came up with this classic. Write four or five such abstracts. Do what your elders do–hire an army of RAs to collect the data that would enable you to turn yourself into a reg monkey. And write the papers. You’ll be a shoo-in for Clark medal in a few years.

35楼

quanchang 发表于 2016-7-21 10:30:42

不错！

36楼

猎户星云 发表于 2016-7-21 10:52:22

顶级学者发表在顶级期刊上的顶级成果，评价却如此两极化，有说是废话的，有说研究精妙的。这种争议本身就说明了现代经济学的尴尬。

这种现象在其他学科存在么？

37楼

jess88jade 发表于 2016-7-21 11:14:22

刘士余，1961年11月出生，江苏灌云人，中共党员，1984年8月参加工作，清华大学水利工程系水利水电工程专业学士，清华大学经济管理学院管理科学与工程专业硕士、技术经济学博士，研究员。现任中国证券监督管理委员会主席、党委书记。
刘士余是学区房出来的学生吗？无数城市里好学区的同龄学生，现在到哪里去了？
马云，也是学区房出来的吗？