399 0

[英文文献] On the Validity of Gamble Tasks to Assess Farmers' Risk Attitudes-试论赌博任务评估农... [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-22
最后登录
2020-9-22

楼主
信息论与编码821 发表于 2006-3-15 18:56:33 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:On the Validity of Gamble Tasks to Assess Farmers' Risk Attitudes-试论赌博任务评估农民风险态度的有效性
英文文献作者:Menapace, Luisa,Colson, Gregory
英文文献摘要:
This article presents evidence on the stability and behavioural validity of alternative survey mechanisms for eliciting farmers' attitudes towards risk. Three hypothetical instruments are considered that differ in terms of the simplicity, context and payoff scale of the decision presented to respondents. Responses are assessed in terms of their relative ability to explain actual farmer crop insurance purchases. Results indicate that measures of risk attitudes are poorly correlated across alternative mechanisms. The strongest positive evidence of behavioural validity is found for the gamble task explicitly defined in the context and scale of farmers' economic activities pertaining to their insurance purchase decision.

本文提供了关于激发农民对风险态度的替代性调查机制的稳定性和行为有效性的证据。三种假设工具被认为是不同的简单性,背景和回报规模的决定,向受访者提出。根据他们解释实际农民购买作物保险的相对能力来评估反应。结果表明,风险态度的衡量是不相关的替代机制。在与农民购买保险决策相关的经济活动的背景和规模中明确定义的赌博任务,行为效度的最有力正向证据被发现。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-2-18 06:06