494 0

[英文文献] Heterogeneous Responses to Social Norms for Water Conservation-对水资源保护的社会规范的异质反应 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-22
最后登录
2020-9-22

楼主
控制工程基础934 发表于 2006-3-25 08:10:44 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Heterogeneous Responses to Social Norms for Water Conservation-对水资源保护的社会规范的异质反应
英文文献作者:Brent, Daniel A.,Cook, Joseph H.,Olsen, Skylar
英文文献摘要:
Utilizing social norms is gaining momentum as a cost-effective mechanism to promote sustainable behavior. We analyze household water data from multiple pilot programs for a company that provides information campaigns containing social comparisons of water use and personalized conservation recommendations in order to reduce household water consumption. We find significant treatment effect heterogeneity across the distribution of consumption and environmental attitudes. In the two pilots with a full year of data one utility achieves savings of 6.5%; while the other in aggregate achieved limited conservation gains. Heterogeneity based on the distribution of consumption is more important in the utility with significant savings, with the highest users saving the most water. In contrast ideology appears to be more important in the utility with an insignificant average treatment effect with dis-savings for those with very low environmental preferences and strong savings for the most environmentally-conscious. Inter-regional ideology may play an critical role since the utility with significant savings is in a much "greener" community, whereas intra-utility ideology is influential in conservative areas. We caution interpretation of the results, particularly for Utility B, as the data are still incomplete.

利用社会规范作为促进可持续行为的成本效益机制的势头正在增强。我们分析了来自多个试点项目的家庭用水数据,为一家公司提供信息宣传活动,包括用水情况的社会比较和个性化的节约建议,以减少家庭用水。我们发现显著的处理效应异质性横跨消费和环境态度的分布。在两个拥有全年数据的试点项目中,一家公用事业公司实现了6.5%的节能;而另一个总体上只取得了有限的保护成果。基于消费分布的异质性在具有显著节能效果的公用事业中更为重要,最高用户节约的水最多。相比之下,意识形态在效用方面似乎更为重要,平均处理效果不显著,对于那些环境偏好非常低的人来说存在负储蓄,而对于最具环境意识的人来说,则有很强的储蓄。跨区域意识形态可能发挥关键作用,因为具有显著节省的效用是在一个更“绿色”的社区,而内部效用意识在保守地区具有影响力。我们谨慎解释结果,特别是效用B,因为数据仍然不完整。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-2-17 21:46