Rough Weather from 5G Tech

相似文件 换一批

是 否 +2 论坛币

k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

Rough Weather from 5G Tech

The rollout of 5G wireless technology will make mobile communications
dramatically faster and more efficient. But 5G could
also lead to dangerous setbacks for weather forecasting. That is
the worry voiced by national and international science agencies
and independent experts. The Federal Communications Commission
(fcc), however, which regulates U.S. wireless networks,
doesn’t seem concerned—and that’s a big problem.
5G promises better performance than earlier generations of
wireless telecommunications. Some of 5G’s frequency bands, however,
are perilously close to those used by weather instruments on
Earth-orbiting satellites. The 5G transmissions at 24 gigahertz can
overlap with the 23.8-GHz signal naturally emitted by atmospheric
water vapor and monitored by these instruments. Visible in day
or night, through clear or cloudy skies, the 23.8-GHz signal is a
reliable indicator of humidity that is used to sharpen weather
forecasts—including the strengths, locations and paths of
storms—on scales from hours to days. Unless, that is, the data are
disrupted by some source of interference—such as the signals
emitted by new 5G base stations and devices.
That interference is measured in units called decibel watts,
and several agencies have called for relatively strict limits on how
much of this electronic noise is permissible—the more negative
the number, the stricter. The European Commission,
for example,
set a maximum threshold of –42 decibel watts. But during an
inaugural auction last year for U.S. rights to use the 24-GHz
transmission band, the fcc set a much looser noise limit of
–20 decibel watts—well in excess of ceilings based on studies from
nasa, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(noaa), and the U.S. Navy. After the auction, noaa acting administrator
Neil Jacobs told Congress that the fcc’s lax noise limits
would result in as much as a 77 percent drop in satellite watervapor
data. This, Jacobs said, could lead to a two- to three-day lag
in predicting the movements of hurricanes, effectively throwing
the nation’s satellite-based forecasting capabilities back to 1980
levels. Moreover, Jacobs testified, 5G interference could force
noaa to abandon plans for new weather satellites.
Yet late last fall delegates of the International Telecommunication
Union Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R), the organization
managing global radio-spectrum use, agreed to introductory
5G noise limits of between –29 and –33 decibel watts. Taking
effect this year, the ITU-R limits are more stringent than the
fcc’s but are still likely to be a problem for meteorologists.
Responding to congressional concerns before last spring’s
auction, commission chair Ajit Pai defended the decisions on 5G
noise limits, calling criticisms “exaggerated and unverified lastminute
assertions.” Yet it is the fcc, not its critics, that is failing
to validate its claims: as of this writing, the commission has
yet to produce any study supporting its recommended 5G noise
limits. Meanwhile the agency is planning auctions of other
5G-frequency bands that overlap with satellite monitoring of precipitation,
clouds and sea ice.
These actions are part of a broader, more disturbing pattern
of imperious behavior by the fcc. The agency has already opened
up previously protected regions of the radio spectrum for new
uses while rapidly moving forward with approvals for globegirdling
constellations of satellites offering broadband Internet.
Both types of activity could degrade a wide array of astronomical
observations from ground-based telescopes, and a massive influx
of new satellites also poses significant risks of creating more
“space junk,” which already threatens existing orbital assets,
including the International Space Station.
Fortunately, the fcc is not unaccountable. In a rare instance
of congressional bipartisanship, in December 2019 the top Democrat
and Republican on the House Science Committee jointly
asked the Government Accountability Office to investigate why,
exactly, the fcc’s 5G recommendations differ so strongly from
those of other federal agencies. This is a good start. Congress
should use its considerable powers, budgetary and otherwise, to
increase pressure on the fcc to “show its work” and to engage
more meaningfully with dissenting government agencies, scientific
institutions and other stakeholders to develop sustainable
solutions for 5G—and for accurate weather forecasting.

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

分享0 收藏0 回帖