楼主: bigfoot0517
2743 4

[外行报告] 2010年5月美国传媒行业研究报告 [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 21粉丝

学术权威

21%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
6
论坛币
12493617 个
通用积分
2.6112
学术水平
391 点
热心指数
369 点
信用等级
405 点
经验
28609 点
帖子
2147
精华
2
在线时间
242 小时
注册时间
2006-11-15
最后登录
2019-1-31

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
【出版时间及名称】:2010年5月美国传媒行业研究报告
        【作者】:NEEDHAM证券
        【文件格式】:pdf
        【页数】:32
        【目录或简介】:

Content’s Migration to Digital Platforms
In 2009, the TV ecosystem generated approximately $140 billion of revenue and had about
$330 billion of public market capitalization. What is the Net Present Value (NPV) of the television
ecosystem in the digital age?
We believe that the biggest economic threat to the NPV of the TV ecosystem comes from
“unbundling” risk. Today, about 100 million U.S. households pay an average of $70 per month for
about 300 video channels. If premium TV content creators allow their programs to become
available individually on the Internet (a la carte), this “unbundling of content” threatens the value
of the TV ecosystem in three primary ways:
􀂾 Subscription revenue would decline by about 15-20%, according to our proprietary survey of 200
TV viewers.
􀂾 Advertising revenue would fall by about 75%, as there are about 16 minutes of advertising per
hour on TV compared with 4 minutes per hour on the web. Pricing is similar on both devices.
􀂾 Disintermediation adds costs. If content companies deliver content directly to consumers,
they must incur customer service costs, which we estimate at $50 per customer per year, or
$5 billion nationally.
We recommend that television content creators treat their primary monetization platform as the TV
because it is the engine that aggregates mass audiences, solidifies programming brands, drives
discovery of their next potential “hit,” creates a viewer base that can then be monetized
(distributed) over more fragmented platforms like the Internet, saves incremental customer service
expenses, and represents an additional revenue stream that Internet-only content creators will
never have.
We recommend that investors purchase triple-play-focused cable companies like Time Warner
Cable (TWC, Buy) because they are largely indifferent about where viewers watch content in the
home. TWC can raise the price of the modem and lower the price of the TV bundle if consumers
increasingly watch premium TV content on their computer.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:行业研究报告 美国传媒 行业研究 传媒行业 研究报告 美国 研究报告 行业

美国传媒 5.pdf

400.31 KB

需要: 65535 个论坛币  [购买]

已有 1 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
industrial -1 -1 -1 “大脚,你妈妈喊你回家吃饭”----你的这些报告萧大王朋友的网站都有了,而且免费

总评分: 学术水平 -1  热心指数 -1  信用等级 -1   查看全部评分

沙发
industrial 发表于 2010-5-11 17:04:56 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
“大脚,你妈妈喊你回家吃饭”----你的这些报告萧大王朋友的网站都有了,而且免费的,你就洗洗睡吧,还号意思还这么贵???!!!

呸!!!!!!!

使用道具

藤椅
yjtwin 发表于 2010-10-28 23:52:52 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
实在有点太贵了, 要那么多论坛币有什么用啊 ;(

使用道具

板凳
jilink128 发表于 2011-3-7 13:10:09 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
穷疯了 没见过论坛币啊 积点德啊
向成功靠近呢

使用道具

报纸
johncalvin 发表于 2011-3-7 13:16:38 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
狮子打开口

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-4-24 12:50