| 所在主题: | |
| 文件名: Disentangling_wrong-way_risk:_pricing_CVA_via_change_of_measures_and_drift_adjustment.pdf | |
| 资料下载链接地址: https://bbs.pinggu.org/a-3691170.html | |
| 附件大小: | |
|
英文标题:
《Disentangling wrong-way risk: pricing CVA via change of measures and drift adjustment》 --- 作者: Damiano Brigo and Fr\\\'ed\\\'eric Vrins --- 最新提交年份: 2016 --- 英文摘要: A key driver of Credit Value Adjustment (CVA) is the possible dependency between exposure and counterparty credit risk, known as Wrong-Way Risk (WWR). At this time, addressing WWR in a both sound and tractable way remains challenging: arbitrage-free setups have been proposed by academic research through dynamic models but are computationally intensive and hard to use in practice. Tractable alternatives based on resampling techniques have been proposed by the industry, but they lack mathematical foundations. This probably explains why WWR is not explicitly handled in the Basel III regulatory framework in spite of its acknowledged importance. The purpose of this paper is to propose a new method consisting of an appealing compromise: we start from a stochastic intensity approach and end up with a pricing problem where WWR does not enter the picture explicitly. This result is achieved thanks to a set of changes of measure: the WWR effect is now embedded in the drift of the exposure, and this adjustment can be approximated by a deterministic function without affecting the level of accuracy typically required for CVA figures. The performances of our approach are illustrated through an extensive comparison of Expected Positive Exposure (EPE) profiles and CVA figures produced either by (i) the standard method relying on a full bivariate Monte Carlo framework and (ii) our drift-adjustment approximation. Given the uncertainty inherent to CVA, the proposed method is believed to provide a promising way to handle WWR in a sound and tractable way. --- 中文摘要: 信用价值调整(CVA)的一个关键驱动因素是风险敞口和交易对手信用风险之间可能存在的依赖关系,即错误方向风险(WWR)。目前,以合理且易于处理的方式解决WWR仍然具有挑战性:学术研究通过动态模型提出了无套利设置,但计算量大,难以在实践中使用。业界已经提出了基于重采样技术的可行替代方案,但它们缺乏数学基矗这可能解释了为什么《巴塞尔协议III》监管框架没有明确处理WWR,尽管其重要性已得到公认。本文的目的是提出一种新的方法,该方法由一个吸引人的折衷方案组成:我们从一个随机强度方法开始,最终得到一个定价问题,在这个问题中,WWR没有明确进入图片。这一结果是通过一系列测量变化实现的:WWR效应现在嵌入到曝光漂移中,并且这种调整可以通过确定性函数近似,而不会影响CVA图形通常需要的精度水平。通过(i)依赖于全双变量蒙特卡罗框架的标准方法和(ii)漂移调整近似方法产生的预期正暴露(EPE)曲线和CVA曲线的广泛比较,说明了我们方法的性能。考虑到CVA固有的不确定性,所提出的方法被认为是以一种合理且易于处理的方式处理WWR的一种有希望的方法。 --- 分类信息: 一级分类:Quantitative Finance 数量金融学 二级分类:Mathematical Finance 数学金融学 分类描述:Mathematical and analytical methods of finance, including stochastic, probabilistic and functional analysis, algebraic, geometric and other methods 金融的数学和分析方法,包括随机、概率和泛函分析、代数、几何和其他方法 -- --- PDF下载: --> |
|
熟悉论坛请点击新手指南
|
|
| 下载说明 | |
|
1、论坛支持迅雷和网际快车等p2p多线程软件下载,请在上面选择下载通道单击右健下载即可。 2、论坛会定期自动批量更新下载地址,所以请不要浪费时间盗链论坛资源,盗链地址会很快失效。 3、本站为非盈利性质的学术交流网站,鼓励和保护原创作品,拒绝未经版权人许可的上传行为。本站如接到版权人发出的合格侵权通知,将积极的采取必要措施;同时,本站也将在技术手段和能力范围内,履行版权保护的注意义务。 (如有侵权,欢迎举报) |
|
京ICP备16021002号-2 京B2-20170662号
京公网安备 11010802022788号
论坛法律顾问:王进律师
知识产权保护声明
免责及隐私声明