楼主: maxth
1042 0

[其他] 紧急求助 [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 0粉丝

本科生

23%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
3 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
2731 点
帖子
69
精华
0
在线时间
67 小时
注册时间
2007-7-27
最后登录
2014-5-5

楼主
maxth 发表于 2011-2-24 10:17:15 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Consider an exchange option with a barrier clause in the following sense: the option is knocked-in (opposite of the knock-out feature we have seen so far) if the price of the asset that we currently do not hold  (denoted V in the slides) crosses a barrier on its way up. The option premium is paid upfront but we do not hold the derivative until the knock-in event occurs. (In contrast, for a knock-out option, we get the option as soon as we pay the premium at time 0.) Use Monte Carlo to price this knock-in exchange option with the following parameters:  V0 = 50; U0 = 50; sigmaV = 0.3; sigmaU = 0.6; rho = 0.7; T = 1; r = 0.03; and the barrier for the V price is 60.


Your price should be estimated with so-called “penny accuracy” (i.e.: the ratio of the length of the 95% confidence interval to the M.C. sample average should be less than 1%) and therefore you need to set the number of your replications accordingly.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:紧急求助 急求助 replications Monte Carlo Replication currently following contrast exchange opposite

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jr
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-14 10:28