摘要翻译:
我们重提Harvie(2000)的结果,并说明如何纠正一些估计参数值中的报告错误导致显著不同的结论,包括飞利浦曲线的实际参数值和估计的均衡就业率平均显示出Harvie(2000)所获得的相对误差的十分之一。
---
英文标题:
《A comment on 'Testing Goodwin: growth cycles in ten OECD countries'》
---
作者:
Matheus R. Grasselli and Aditya Maheshwari
---
最新提交年份:
2018
---
分类信息:
一级分类:Economics 经济学
二级分类:Econometrics 计量经济学
分类描述:Econometric Theory, Micro-Econometrics, Macro-Econometrics, Empirical Content of Economic Relations discovered via New Methods, Methodological Aspects of the Application of Statistical Inference to Economic Data.
计量经济学理论,微观计量经济学,宏观计量经济学,通过新方法发现的经济关系的实证内容,统计推论应用于经济数据的方法论方面。
--
一级分类:Quantitative Finance 数量金融学
二级分类:Economics 经济学
分类描述:q-fin.EC is an alias for econ.GN. Economics, including micro and macro economics, international economics, theory of the firm, labor economics, and other economic topics outside finance
q-fin.ec是econ.gn的别名。经济学,包括微观和宏观经济学、国际经济学、企业理论、劳动经济学和其他金融以外的经济专题
--
---
英文摘要:
We revisit the results of Harvie (2000) and show how correcting for a reporting mistake in some of the estimated parameter values leads to significantly different conclusions, including realistic parameter values for the Philips curve and estimated equilibrium employment rates exhibiting on average one tenth of the relative error of those obtained in Harvie (2000).
---
PDF链接:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.01527


雷达卡



京公网安备 11010802022788号







