20110611 Follow Me 32 bengdi1986

32,32
The cheaters, who married to powerful and successful wives and depend on them financially, may be unfaithful because of psychological needs. In the daily life, their wives probably donimate the family and the men are under control. Their desire for being dominant, which overweighs the risk of being caught and losing reputation and fortune, is fulfilled psychologically by cheating.
PS. I’m still making preparations for the final examination and will have some free time about a week later.

30,30
This is a quite interesting paper. But after I have seen the movie Inside Job, it provided me a little bit different perspective. The economics is established on the foundation that each man is irrational. But in cases of those engaged in inside trading, one thing I'm quite clear is that these TOP executives are not so irrational. People from TOP biz schools directors, rating agencies presidents, banking industry managers, are in a group of interest. They can afford whatever they can lose because they always desire more. People are good when he/she holds the moral ethics. But everything will become mirage when this is broken.~~

占个座，等会回来。位置好紧张啊，呵呵

why is men unfaith? it is not fair. The desire belongs to all the human, with men and women.
although, there is high opportunity cost, the desire is infinite.

32,32
From this article,we can see that superwoman is not always good.我记得有位老师给我上课时说过一句话，“女生就不应该读研，读研后就不可爱了”，呵呵！

32,32
Sometimes in my thought, is it  fact that we want economic doctrine go too far ?

6.6
The rational/irrational explanation is apparently not enough to explain cheating behavior at very high stake. It's the internal pressure as well as the external environment that drives out a person's flipside of his or her character. I would agree with the Cornell sociologist that threatening of masculinity will cause transgression, but this phenomenon per se is not against previous conclusion that  too much power will cause hubris. Arnold Schwarzeneger was the living example of such transgression, but still after his stepping down as governor (rationality can not explain). Tiger Woods would be the leading example for hubris. The lesson learned was that the propelling force should not be accumulated above certain limit and people should have a way out through communication within family.  In that sense, the ancient Chinese golden mean philosophy might be a cure to all those who are attempted to go to extremes. We still have no idea whether the evolution of mankind in this direction is good or bad, but it looks like that the ever developing human productivity will need less and less masculinity and therefore cause more cheatings.

32,32

It is said that men like to be the center.  And those ladies who always notice them are more likely to be loved than those who look pretty.  I guess this is one of potential reasons why man with successful wife is more likely to be unfaithful. Those who have to be economically supported by their husbands have no other choices but to doing everything possible to cater to their other parts, while this case will hardly happen on successful wives, partly because they are busy, partly because of their independence.
Besides,  celebrities are more likely to catch the public eyes. If they are ordinary people, no one will notice the insider-trading. But for those well-knowns, maybe even they have no intention of doing so, someone will conspire to seduce them.

29,29
This article discuss a tradional view that rich men will less possibly commit crimes. The best-paid executives' insider-trading indicates that the rich men behave badly. I think this can be explained by Becker's benefit-cost analyse frame. The benefit of insider-trading of the top executives may be higher, so the result cannot be clear theoretically. In fact, Becker's frame is so open that it can include various of  explaination. In my recent crime empirical research, the economitrics result supports that the higher income, the higher crime rate in the country.  But it doesn't mean Becker and Ehrlich were wrong. There must be some invisible benefit or cost we still have not found.
OK.

我这水平有待进一步提高啊，这篇看不大懂

32,32
今天的翻译哥怎么没来呀，这篇文章读起来比较朦胧啊