楼主: denver
4403 39

[财经英语角区] 20111011 Follow Me 154 by Denver [推广有奖]

21
xlliu007 发表于 2011-10-11 16:26:24
看完了俩遍

22
xlliu007 发表于 2011-10-11 16:26:24
看完了俩遍

23
whachel1976 发表于 2011-10-11 18:42:22
Sargent’s awarded research concerns methods that utilize historical data to understand how systematic changes in economic policy affect the economy over time. He first develops a structural macroeconomic model, then solves it with mathematics and finally uses statistical methods to obtain numerical values for the parameters which describe the economic structure.

Sims's awarded research focuses on distinguishing between unexpected changes in variables. He proposed a new method of identifying and interpreting economic shocks in historical data and of analyzing how such shocks are gradually transmitted to different macroeconomic variables. In the first step, the analyst makes a forecast for macroeconomic variables using a vector-autoregression model (a VAR model). The second step involves extracting the fundamental shocks to which the economy has been exposed.And the third step in Sims’s method is an impulse-response analysis, which illustrates the impact over time of the fundamental shocks to the macroeconomic variables.

Sims shared Sargent’s criticism of the large macroeconometric models which were earlier used by researchers,central banks and ministries of finance. He also concurred with Sargent in emphasizing the importance of expectations. The empirical strategies proposed by Sargent and Sims are intercomparable. Both of their methods are widely used in different areas nowadays.

Sargent’s contributions are mainly methodological since his method requires specific assumptions about the structure of the economy. With detailed knowledge about the structure of the economy, Sargent’s method may be preferable, in particular since it allows a counterfactual analysis of systematic changes in economic policy. But when knowledge of the field is less exact, Sims’s method may be safer.

Owing to the scientific contributions of Sargent and Sims, research in macroeconomics and analysis of economic policy have advanced substantially. Their combined work constitutes a solid found.




24
jackie20110909 发表于 2011-10-11 19:53:23
good

25
rxlk103 发表于 2011-10-11 19:53:27
Good~
天道酬勤~

26
starskyjing 发表于 2011-10-11 21:47:56
那个时间序列和VAR模型,我一直没学好~~
经济学的东西不比化学医药等的发明,都是书面实验,有这样的成果真的很了不起。
希望不久的将来,我们国家也出一个诺贝尔奖获得者~~

27
王航 发表于 2011-10-11 21:57:02
计量经济学的崛起,标志着统计学的没落啊,统计人该何去何从??
计量经济学家近几年不断获得诺贝尔经济学奖,统计人情何以堪啊

28
purplehairs 发表于 2011-10-11 21:58:23
Follow Me:152, 115
经济学是科学和艺术的结合,单纯靠科学的量化和数据是不能解释真正的经济现象的。

29
ddovels 发表于 2011-10-11 22:08:23
看了几遍,还是有点看不懂。明天继续看,今年的诺贝尔经济学奖是宏观经济学的,8错8错。。

30
xzhwsh 发表于 2011-10-11 22:13:27
好长好长\(^o^)/~

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-7 07:36