楼主: zhanghui123
7965 13

[学术与投稿] 请教共同方法偏差CMV [推广有奖]

教师

已卖:1576份资源

学术权威

46%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
1
论坛币
2984 个
通用积分
44.4100
学术水平
138 点
热心指数
195 点
信用等级
95 点
经验
1022 点
帖子
4196
精华
0
在线时间
7165 小时
注册时间
2008-3-22
最后登录
2025-11-4

初级热心勋章

楼主
zhanghui123 发表于 2011-11-26 12:18:02 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
请问如何检验共同方法偏差CMV,关键是如何用软件实现,谢谢指导。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:如何用 如何 软件

沙发
爱爱别离 发表于 2011-11-26 19:45:58
难难难

藤椅
xxz456458 发表于 2011-11-30 13:17:32
用HAMAN单因素检验和结构方程的方法,详情请联系:qq787983551

板凳
zhanghui123 发表于 2011-11-30 13:20:03
xxz456458 发表于 2011-11-30 13:17
用HAMAN单因素检验和结构方程的方法,详情请联系:qq787983551
已加你QQ,我也是临沂的。

报纸
n954050002 发表于 2013-5-7 12:10:39
Common Latent Factor This method uses a common latent factor (CLF) to capture the common variance among all observed variables in the model. To do this, simply add a latent factor to your AMOS CFA model (as in the figure below), and then connect it to all observed items in the model. Then compare the standardized regression weights from this model to the standardized regression weights of a model without the CLF. If there are large differences (like greater than 0.200) then you will want to retain the CLF as you either impute composites from factor scores, or as you move in to the structural model. The CLF video tutorial demonstrates how to do this.

  Marker Variable This method is simply an extended, and probably more accurate way to do the common latent factor method. For this method, just add another latent factor to the model (as in the figure below), but make sure it is something that you would not expect to correlate with the other latent factors in the model (i.e., the observed variables for this new factor should have low, or no, correlation with the observed variables from the other factors). Then add the common latent factor. This method teases out truer common variance than the basic common latent factor method because it is finding the common variance between unrelated latent factors. Thus, any common variance is likely due to a common method bias, rather than natural correlations. This method is demonstrated in the common method bias video tutorial.

已有 2 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
xuezhe116 + 1 + 1 + 1 对论坛有贡献
zhanghui123 + 4 + 4 + 4 热心帮助其他会员

总评分: 学术水平 + 5  热心指数 + 5  信用等级 + 5   查看全部评分

地板
xuezhe116 发表于 2013-7-25 20:15:00
原来如此!感谢楼主!
中国需要一场新的甲午战争吗?

7
liuzhihong1130 发表于 2016-3-30 22:26:33
你好,请问Marker潜变量的观测变量是哪里来的啊 ?

8
zhanghui123 发表于 2016-3-31 08:16:25
liuzhihong1130 发表于 2016-3-30 22:26
你好,请问Marker潜变量的观测变量是哪里来的啊 ?
问卷里设置的

9
liuzhihong1130 发表于 2016-4-1 16:59:54
zhanghui123 发表于 2016-3-31 08:16
问卷里设置的
难道是问卷中设置的,与所研究的自变量、因变量无关的问题吗?还是其他什么问题啊?

10
zhanghui123 发表于 2016-4-1 19:32:59
liuzhihong1130 发表于 2016-4-1 16:59
难道是问卷中设置的,与所研究的自变量、因变量无关的问题吗?还是其他什么问题啊?
就是在问卷中设置的。你可以搜搜文献看看,有共同方法变异的文献综述

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-4 03:52